Fedora 16 killed my eth0 ?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 05.04.2012 22:32, schrieb Tom Horsley:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:38:24 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
>> this is NOT how improvement looks
> 
> Even more fun, there has been at least one update to
> the biosdevname package that caused it to generate
> different "fixed" names than it previously generated.
> 
> So much for the stated goal of the project...
> 
> It really would make vastly more sense to have
> retained support for the persistent-net rules
> generation while using biosdevname to provide
> the initial names recorded in the file.
> 
> That way, if I wanted a different name, I
> could edit the file and get it.

well, but how to act that fedora developers realize
that their "improvements" are often not more and
not less as damage to well working things?

everytime you tell tehm they are pissed off and will not believe
that the world is not turning only around their mantra
"change for the sake of the change"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120405/2037838d/attachment-0001.sig>