"No driver found" when installing F14 to a 2TB drive using netinstall

[Reindl Harald]

Am 27.04.2012 23:18, schrieb jdow:
> On 2012/04/27 13:57, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the core-system is exactly the same, systemd is no rocket science
>> making no upgrade and run a KNOWN vulnerable system because
>> fear you could make a mistake with the new one is the wrong way
>>
>> you are still making the mistake by install a vulnerable system
>>
>> and yes, i am a little bit sensible since many of the attacks
>> in the last months and especially last days coming from poorly
>> maintained machines all over the wolrd and nobdy pays me my lifetime
>> wasting with such issues caused by others
> 
> Now that you've had your rant, he is talking an embedded system. Remember
> that when you contemplate the following. Suppose for a moment that this
> is a theatrical lighting console application. (I know of at least one that
> runs Linux  underneath.) It won't be connected to the Internet, at least
> not directly. 

that still does not explain why not using a distribution which offers
secruity updates for ten years like CentOS6 which is based on fedora
AND even offers GNOME2 - sorry there is simply no reason using fedora
14 as abse for anything in this world

i saw so many people failing by "security is not relvent here and there"

what are you doing with F14 on new hardware when you get no kernel updates?
CentOS get's kernel updates with recent hardware drivers
only this should explain why choosing a EOL F14 for embedded is stupid



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120427/f5dc19f6/attachment.sig>