Matching message headers in mutt hooks

[Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I]

On 07/08/2012 08:47 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Heinz Diehl <htd at fritha.org> wrote:
>> On 08.07.2012, suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>>> However I used `\\.' instead of `\.', I believe the former
>>> should match a literal `.' just like `\\+'?
>> Yes, of course. I simply overlooked the second slash here, sorry!
>> If the expression only should match on a single point, you have to
>> double-escape the "." here, otherwise it will match on any single
>> character.
>>
> Thanks a lot for the confirmation! I am liking mutt a lot. I think
> I'll fiddle some more. :)
>

If I may?...exactly what IS "mutt"?....is it something I should concern 
myself with?


EGO II