grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
Ed Greshko
Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Sun Mar 18 23:47:47 UTC 2012
On 03/18/2012 11:00 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Just did an update and it included a new kernel, but then on
> reboot after running grub2-mkconfig noticed that the newest one
> was not first. Seems to be sorting the 9 before the 10?
>
> Is this a bug?
> I use the default="0", so this makes it not use the latest?
FWIW, yesterday came a kernel update to 3.2.10-3 and everything seems fine here.
I've not modified anything and my grub.conf contains set default="0".
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both
be wrong. -- Dandemis
More information about the users
mailing list