grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?

Ed Greshko Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Sun Mar 18 23:47:47 UTC 2012


On 03/18/2012 11:00 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Just did an update and it included a new kernel, but then on 
> reboot after running grub2-mkconfig noticed that the newest one 
> was not first. Seems to be sorting the 9 before the 10?
>
> Is this a bug? 
> I use the default="0", so this makes it not use the latest?

FWIW, yesterday came a kernel update to 3.2.10-3 and everything seems fine here. 
I've not modified anything and my grub.conf contains set default="0".

-- 
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both
be wrong. -- Dandemis


More information about the users mailing list