READ ME: When replying to users digest...

[Phil Dobbin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/03/2012 13:02, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:48:29 +0000,
>   Phil Dobbin <bukowskiscat at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Digest mode is perfectly acceptable for use when searching for
>> relevant topics but a bore when replying. Mailing list software varies
>> in its capabilities on the response side of things so I always use cut
>> & paste. Believe me, the version of the response I see on the digest
>> is far worse than someone who is subscribed for regular delivery ;-)
> 
> That are two available formats for digests. The nice one includes each
> message as an attachment. In this form you can reply to individual
> attachments. The other form mashes all of the messages together in one
> text/plain part, that makes it pretty much impossible to do correct
> replies to messages.


Thank you, Bruno.

I'd seen the attachments at the bottom of the digest but assumed
incorrectly as it turns out, that these were pgp signatures.

This will make replying much more efficient & certainly less tedious.

Cheers,

  Phil...

- -- 
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.

	Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPaeccAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJtXAH/Rd5XcdQkwlkfDrp/qh+JOZr
v8iuncl9DfBgI0PeeStkXSfIrwcxGrFwwxw6M4vLOJ1XORMje719nJrHoulqEi4/
DJn2VE4MDQtTFDr6CGsinCAQWPhCJdlJFPO5AYPvlbC4OuktNMUR8gDLcK+DnknX
CQjecViOkOutFVN6A4QZP780xw7V+We/Z/WtAtdrCd7ebF9O4/dn+hKlIR+ykC3C
lL72Uj8Bi5yVRW5TGAyg5ejW7tiqByL9uYZ/OWd/Lzo7wU2iOfCs4NtqSPEkD+1O
3EZA2nd5Ebr9ZJdb2wS2NiLWtWKnPnPlX4NZU8CDhP5m0odSIOXB1h/ZiGkdzyI=
=1JIy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----