update errors

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 10/11/2013 04:02 PM, Frank wrote:
> Updated my 19 installation this morning and ran into errors again.
>
> This is from yum's log:
>
>
> Oct 11 09:42:09 Updated: gnupg2-2.0.22-1.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:10 Updated: usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:11 Updated: psacct-6.6.1-7.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:11 Updated: libtar-1.2.11-26.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:25 psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686: ts_done name in te is 
> usbmuxd should be psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:27 kernel-headers-3.11.3-201.fc19.i686: ts_done name in 
> te is psacct should be kernel-headers-3.11.3-201.fc19.i686
> Oct 11 09:42:28 libtar-1.2.11-25.fc19.i686: ts_done name in te is 
> kernel-headers should be libtar-1.2.11-25.fc19.i686
>
>
> Then i checked rpm :
>
>
> [root at localhost log]# rpm -qa | grep usbmuxd
> usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc19.i686
> usbmuxd-1.0.8-9.fc19.i686
> [root at localhost log]#
*-10 is in updates-testing, not in updates, so you are mildly cheating 
by telling us to be running f19 ;)

>
> I can remove rpms reference to the old usbmuxd as I encountered
> similar problems a week or two ago.
>
> Are these packaging problems or what ?
Yes, this is a packaging bug in usbmux* < *-10 [1].

*-10 fixes this bug, however as the bug is in < *-10 (which everybody 
has installed), there is hardly anything we can do about it packaging-wise.
=> upgrading to *-10 will cause everybody to hit this bug and go through 
this bumpy and uneasy road.

After upgrading to *-10, try
# rpm -e --noscripts usbmuxd-1.0.8-9.fc19.i686

FWIW: There are further similar bugs in 1 or 2 rarely used packages in 
f19 and a few more in current f20.

Ralf

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017493

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131011/6a6c4dea/attachment.html>