Mesa-10.2.5 was released - while Fedora still ships 10.1 :/

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 16:21:51 +0200,
  Heinz Diehl <htd+ml at fritha.org> wrote:
>On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages
>> that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that
>> need to get rebuilt in order to link with the updated mesa. I can believe
>> that the latter set could get you over 20 packages.
>
>[htd at kiera ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i "mesa"
>mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
>mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
>mesa-filesystem-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libEGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.i686
>mesa-dri-drivers-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
>mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libxatracker-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libGLU-devel-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
>mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
>
>Wrt the mix of 32/64 bit packages (on my system), I would consider
>rebuilding them a nightmare..

Those aren't all separate packages. A single package can be associated with 
more than one rpm. When you run rpmbuild on a package, it builds all of 
the rpms for it at once. 

However as I mentioned, there are packages that depend on mesa that are 
going to need to be rebuilt as well, and that could add up.