why would using "sftp" require disabling "vsftpd"?

[poma]

On 07.02.2014 10:08, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:30:26 +0100
> poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 07.02.2014 02:04, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 01:14:05 +0100
>>> poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Secure File Transfer Protocol
>>>> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
>>>> Subsystem	sftp	/usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server
>>>>
>>>> man 5 sshd_config
>>>> man 8 sftp-server
>>>> man 1 sftp
>>>>
>>>> 5+8+1=13!
>>>
>>> Sorry, I failed to understand what you meant with this last bit
>>> about sum to 13. Care to elaborate, please?
>>
>> :)
>> Thanks for asking!
>> Actually with that phrase I stress somewhat of a misnomer for the
>> program - "sftp".
>> Some kind of comparison would be, if something like a web browser gets
>> the name as "http".
> 
> Maybe I'm just dense today...
> 
> I understood your answer to the OP regarding the difference between
> protocols, clients and stuff. What I didn't understand was the
> connection of all that to the statement
> 
>>>> 5+8+1=13!
> 
> I mean, given that 5+8+1=14, am I missing some non-obvious humor here?
> I really don't get it...
> 
> Best, :-)
> Marko
> 
> 

The summands - the left side:
"The partition numbers are counted from one, not from zero …"
The sum - from the right side of the expression:
"The number ‘0’ is the drive number, which is counted from zero."
:)
Actually the one on the left side is the surplus resulting due to
improper naming scheme(sftp), compared to the previous two.


poma