Impossible to add a remote printer

[poma]

On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote:
> On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote:
>>> can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want
>>> to share the printer that the relevant port is closed?
>>
>> Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting
>> to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to
>> start with.
>>
>> Tim.
>> */
>>
> 
> I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :)
> Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened.
> 

Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment?
Perhaps I missed some technicalities related.