<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.9">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
sometimes other than security ...you may not need an upgrade . my fedora box has been ruining since the release . i will do a complete new install when fc 2 stable comes out . if your maintaining that many computers . id go get red hat enterprise . unless its a cheap company . <BR>
then just let us know what happen and we can QA it . unless you dont know what your doing . if u need to flam me do it off the board . On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 17:30, Res wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#ff0000"><I>Well ive listened to the other bashers and those ones who think Fedora
will be better than the RH we knew....I maintain about 40 slackware
boxes, 2 fedora and 3 RH9. since the last round of updates the 2 fedora
boxes have died several times without reason, total lockup on kernel
panics. the other boxes incl rh9 just chug away like they are not even
there, because RH 9 will cease to get supporot in 2 months, i will be
going into the data center today to piss off the 2 fedora boxes and
replace them with slackware, and sadly,in a couple months or whenever i
get sick ofmanually making and applying updates, the 2 RH9 boxes will go
to slackware as well... I find it unacceptable that fedora is now the
winblow$ on the linux world., as I and numerous
other loyal RH's since almost day one saw this lack of QC with these
fedora changes, I am not at all suprised.
I do not know what checking process is in place now with this 'open co
munity' bullshit but its F'in pathetic QC compared to the old.
</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>