<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/3/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Les Mikesell</b> <<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:08, Anil Kumar Sharma wrote:<br>> Windows give freedom to install new programs any where, including
<br>> default. In a way this flexibility is good if one nears full capacity<br>> of the partition.<br><br>How do you move the registry?</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div> Simply, I don't want to move registry. OK but why would I want to do that? The basic reason for relocating the programs is to be able to cope with a partition nearing full capacity. </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> Under Win, almost all programmes can be relocated some way after<br>> install or by re-installation. Under Linux rigid rule "not
<br>> relocatable" is prevalent.<br><br>What does that mean in relation to files? I've only seen it<br>used in terms of libraries where it means it is compiled for<br>static linkage.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>There is no need to - disturb / play with - the basic requirements of a working OS. I would not want to move ../system32 for /usr/sbin older again he basics of the objective are clear. </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">--<br>Les Mikesell<br> <a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a><br><br><br>--<br>
fedora-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a><br>To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>I do not mean to offend Linux lovers including myself, but kindly be generous and sporting.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Anil Kumar Shrama