<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Phil Meyer</b> <<a href="mailto:pmeyer@themeyerfarm.com">pmeyer@themeyerfarm.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Timothy Murphy wrote:<br>> Ric Moore wrote:<br>><br>><br>>> I hated YAST. A truly horrible interface. What we have<br>>> just plain works. Ric<br>>><br>><br>> snip ...<br>><br>> In my opinion, this, and Anaconda,
<br>> are the two weakest parts of Fedora.<br>><br>><br>><br><br>Ahem. There is nothing in any other distro to compete with kick start<br>and anaconda for automated installs.<br><br>Jumpstart for Solaris is without a doubt the most mature automated
<br>configuration tool on the planet for UNIX based systems.<br><br>Kick Start and anaconda fare quite well against Jumpstart. That is not<br>a mild complement.<br><br>For many of us, our users never get involved with installing anything on
<br>their systems. Literally hundreds of desktops can be stamped out in a<br>day, with hardware variances accounted for, using kick start and anaconda.<br><br>So to be specific, there are some aspects of anaconda which a user would
<br>see if doing the install themselves that you don't approve of. I can<br>accept that.<br><br>For many of us, anaconda and kick start are why we follow fedora and<br>recommend RH to our customers. :)</blockquote><div><br>
True.<br>I am one happy RH guy who've done ~300 installs in a day, using kickstart and anaconda.<br>+1 for the thoughts.<br><br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
--<br>fedora-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a><br>To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>