<div>Actually, CentOS 5.1 isn't that bad as a desktop. So you could probably get away</div>
<div>with using just one machine. The Linux desctop have come a long way, and you no</div>
<div>longer need to be on the bleeding edge to have a resonable set of functionality.<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">2008/3/24, Mauriat M <<a href="mailto:mirandam@gmail.com">mirandam@gmail.com</a>>:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Arthur Pemberton <<a href="mailto:pemboa@gmail.com">pemboa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Valent Turkovic<br>> <<a href="mailto:valent.turkovic@gmail.com">valent.turkovic@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > <a href="http://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/">http://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/</a><br>
> ><br>> > What is your experience ?<br>><br>> The general wisdom from fedora power users is:<br>> - Fedora for the desktop / workstation<br>> - CentOS for the home server or other unsupported server<br>
> - RedHat for a serious server or otherwise when support is needed<br>><br>> * by support I mean paid support<br>><br>> Also, SELinux isn't nearly that hard. I wouldn't put a box on the open<br>
> internet without SELinux.<br>><br><br>Well I guess I was hoping for the best of both worlds by having my<br>desktop "act" as a server. Why have 2 machines when 1 will do?<br><br>Too much to ask, I know.<br>
<br>-Mauriat<br><br>--<br>fedora-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a><br>To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>