<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/15 Anne Wilson <<a href="mailto:cannewilson@googlemail.com">cannewilson@googlemail.com</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> IMHO, KDE4-release was underwhelming and shouldn't have been released<br>
> until it reached feature a parity with KDE 3.5.x.<br>
> IMO, bugs and crashes can be forgiven - but not having an option to set<br>
> the order of applets on a panel (only added in 4.0.3?) or change the<br>
> appearance of the panel was inexcusable.<br>
><br>
</div>Why? What exactly do you want to do that you can't? It's true that<br>
improvements are coming all the time, but the panel arrangement, for example,<br>
arrived in time for F9 release.</blockquote></div><br>- i cannot put second panel<br>- i cannot add icon on desktop to launch application or enter directory<br>- i cannot add any icon to panel to start applications<br>- there are less applets than in KDE 3.x, for example I was not able to find out how to add "show desktop" applet<br>
<br>For me it seems like a big mistake to publisj F 9 with KDE 4 which have less possibilities than older version, as I use KDE as primary environment is F9 not usable for me at this time. I have feeling that Fedora do not care about KDE users and that many users will stay on older F8.<br>
<br>Michal<br>-- <br><a href="http://www.mountainbike.cz">www.mountainbike.cz</a> | JndM.net<br>ICQ: 132536462 | Skype: michal_janda