<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:36 PM, psmith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:psmith@fedoraproject.org">psmith@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 01/04/10 23:44, Craig White wrote:<br>
<br>
> I do have faith that Fedora governance is<br>
> independent of Red Hat.<br>
><br>
> Craig<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div>you are joking right? fedora is just a testing ground for redhat (think<br>
selinux, pulseaudio, abrt etc etc), and the governance is full of<br>
@<a href="http://redhat.com" target="_blank">redhat.com</a> people<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>You know how it is, some people like to see things their way.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>I, for one, have no objection with Fedora being used as a test bench for RHEL: if RH invests in Fedora, it should get a return on investment. This is normal business.<br>
<br>OTOH, I'm really glad that there is absolutely no problem at RH/Fedora (RHF) since, after checking insiders tradings at Yahoo, if there was a problem, I would truly have no idea on how to solve it. I can't figure how the figures I see there are compatible with developers working for Red Hat for free... Ooops! I meant "contributing their work" for free.<br>
<br>So, no problem and no solution: everything is fine.<br><br>Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and doesn't get a cent back... for now.<br></div></div><br>