On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Sam Sharpe <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:lists.redhat@samsharpe.net">lists.redhat@samsharpe.net</a>&gt;</span> wrot<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<br>
There is better coverage here:<br>
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Better coverage of a sort, I suppose.</div><div><br></div>&quot;A warning today that Linux users are not as immune to security threats as many of them like to believe&quot;</div><div class="gmail_quote">
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Anyone who is naive enough to believe that Linux cannot be affected by poisoned software from just about anywhere really shouldn&#39;t be mucking around with that kind of stuff.</div><div class="gmail_quote">
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Robert Myers.</div>