On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Marcel Rieux <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:m.z.rieux@gmail.com">m.z.rieux@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Haley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aph@redhat.com" target="_blank">aph@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<br>
</div>I think the best way for me to improve this list is to provide help<br>
where it's needed and try to avoid tedious arguments. I don't think<br>
that anyone made me the hall monitor.<br>
<br>
In the end, the only real way to improve the signal to noise ratio is<br>
to add to the signal. To that end, I'm out of here.<br></blockquote></div><div><br>Absolutely! What I don't understand is why people who want to, in their opinion, increase the signal to noise ratio feel necessary to post this shit here. Everybody knows you can filter out a thread or a user. What's the use of saying you're filtering my message if it's not for intimidation purposes? Do you need to comfort yourself or other users in the decision you have taken?<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>The irony, Marcel, is that if your request was actually taken seriously, and this list became moderated (which is a headache anyway, since there is no "post-posted moderation" possible in a mailing list) is that you'd be the first to go. <br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Chris<br><br><br><br>