<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Ed Greshko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Ed.Greshko@greshko.com" target="_blank">Ed.Greshko@greshko.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 06/23/2012 04:01 PM, JD wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Ed Greshko <<a href="mailto:Ed.Greshko@greshko.com">Ed.Greshko@greshko.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ed.Greshko@greshko.com">Ed.Greshko@greshko.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 06/23/2012 02:40 PM, JD wrote:<br>
> > Does anyone know if there are plans to provide HFS write support?<br>
> > In which release?<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Write support to HFS+ file systems is supported now. The only caveat is that you<br>
> must disabling journaling on the file system.<br>
><br>
><br>
> I suppose that hfsplus is hfs with journaling?<br>
<br>
That is just one of the differences. There are others. Two others are, HFS+<br>
supports longer file names as well as file names in Unicode.<br>
><br>
> I see<br>
> /sbin/fsck.hfsplus<br>
> /sbin/mkfs.hfsplus<br>
><br>
> If the answer to my question is positive,<br>
> then why provide the above 2 commands?<br>
<br>
????<br>
<br>
fsck.hfsplus — HFS file system consistency check<br>
mkfs.hfsplus — construct a new HFS Plus file system<br>
<br>
commands have totally different purposes.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"></span></blockquote><div><br>I was trying to find out if linux provided different versions <br>of these tools for the journaled and non journaled HFS.<br><br></div></div>