<div dir="ltr">Hi<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, David Beveridge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dave@bevhost.com" target="_blank">dave@bevhost.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">see<br>
<a href="http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html" target="_blank">http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html</a><br>
<br>
Controversy surrounds Red Hat's "obfuscated" source code release<br>
This change, noted by Maxillian Attems andLWN.net, appears to be aimed<br>
at Oracle, who like others, repackage Red Hat's source as the basis<br>
for its Unbreakable Linux.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, this was aimed at Oracle but doesn't affect CentOS since CentOS merely rebuilds the SRPM and doesn't fiddle with kernel patches<br><br></div><div>
Rahul <br></div></div></div></div></div>