<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Robert Holtzman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:holtzm@cox.net" target="_blank">holtzm@cox.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:<br>
<br>
.........snip.........<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> Ignore and move on? Would you say the same thing if we, the state, threw<br>
> you in prison for the use of the term? Civil society already does. Case in<br>
> point: use of the term "my account has been hacked" or "...website had been<br>
> hacked" have negative connotations; instead of looking to fix homes in<br>
> faulty software, they blame someone for attacking them. This has to change.<br>
<br>
</div>No, it doesn't *have to* change and will actively resist.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> People don't normally intend to rob a bank when they go in to make a<br>
> withdrawal. They have to understand that the same goes for hackers.<br>
<br>
</div>No, they don't *have to* understand and will actively resist.<br>
<br>
What you're trying to change is human nature.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
</div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div style>You are just going to let society walk all over you? </div></div><br></div></div>