<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rc040203@freenet.de" target="_blank">rc040203@freenet.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":7dx" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">Likely. But Fedora would never have started to use systemd if Poettering wasn't RH-employed.<br>
<br>
Actually nobody, would have taken notice about systemd.<span class=""><br>
</span></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">As the guy who happened to be the FPL when systemd was implemented in Fedora, I don't think that's true at all. Just like all of the major changes in Fedora, we evaluate them based on their technical merit, and not based on the company paying the person to write the code. There was a lot of technical debate around systemd when it was first proposed for Fedora, and I imagine that same sort of thing would have happened no matter who Lennart worked for. <br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Again, I don't see why people opposed to systemd resort to making this a personal attack. It's not about the person, it's about the code. And for better or worse, it's code we've decided to use in Fedora. Is it perfect? Nope? Did I have my own personal misgivings about using systemd when it first came out in Fedora? I have to admit that I did. But what I've found over the past couple of years is that I've really come to like systemd, and I absolutely think it was the right decision. <br><br>--<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Jared Smith<br></div></div>