<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 9/23/2014 18:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHc5q3djspor9m7GXDhYZFVQAre0kN+i85CmGs6hSve4ypukRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi<br>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM,
Dave Ihnat <span dir="ltr"></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
Let's decide that before we argue any more on the
merits--or lack<br>
thereof--of systemd itself. If it's not going to change
Redhat's<br>
decision, then all we can meaningfully discuss here are
discovered<br>
issues and any resolutions of same with the current
implementation of<br>
systemd.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
Fedora has adopted systemd long ago and RHEL has
followed that. It is unlikely Red Hat is going to
change that direction based on conspiracy theories and
personal attacks.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't think anyone would expect Red Hat to change direction based
on "conspiracy theories and personal attacks". What Dave positied,
quite eloquently I might add, is the notion that substantive
discussion might influence Red Hat with respect to systemd. Can you
speak to that specific point, Rahul?<br>
<br>
<br>
Tom<br>
</body>
</html>