[fedora-virt] Fedora Virt status (XML for SL6)

[Boris Derzhavets]

> If I have read the previous emails correctly this is because on SL6 the
> virtio drivers are used automagically for the install whereas you need
> to switch to virtio-disk after the fact when on Fedora.

It's pretty much correct.
Then why F14 (2.6.35) doesn't behave the same way as SL 6 (2.6.32) does  ?

Boris.

--- On Sat, 1/15/11, Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> wrote:

From: Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es>
Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Fedora Virt status (XML for SL6)
To: virt at lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 1:03 PM

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:45:07AM -0800, Boris Derzhavets wrote:

> Your's the most advanced KVM System F14 performs W7 (x64/x86) install
> on IDE boot up device (LV) much slower then RHEL 6 does (SL 6 does)
> Both systems have "cache set to none for IDE boot up device" before
> install starts up.

If I have read the previous emails correctly this is because on SL6 the
virtio drivers are used automagically for the install whereas you need
to switch to virtio-disk after the fact when on Fedora.

I don't think this behaviour qualifies is a bug.

-- 
sven === jabber/xmpp: sven at lankes.net
_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/attachments/20110115/d0768e70/attachment.html