[fedora-virt] virsh output discrepancy with vol-list

[Cole Robinson]

On 04/13/2013 10:25 PM, Shergill, Gurinder wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cole Robinson [mailto:crobinso at redhat.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:47 PM
>> To: Shergill, Gurinder
>> Cc: virt at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] virsh output discrepancy with vol-list
>>
>> On 04/10/2013 11:06 PM, Shergill, Gurinder wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am seeing following discrepancy with virsh output for volume list,
>> which goes away when I restart the libvirtd daemon.
>>>
>>> Here virsh shows 4 volumes. Also, notice that first 2 volumes are
>> duplicates.
>>>
>>> $ virsh vol-list --pool default
>>> Name                 Path
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> crab.vol.0.img       /var/lib/libvirt/images/crab.vol.0.img
>>> crab.vol.0.img       /var/lib/libvirt/images/crab.vol.0.img
>>> fish.vol.0.img       /var/lib/libvirt/images/fish.vol.0.img
>>> fish.vol.1.img       /var/lib/libvirt/images/fish.vol.1.img
>>>
>>> However, none of the above volumes currently exist (as I had just
>> deleted them using, again, using virsh).
>>>
>>> $ ll /var/lib/libvirt/images/
>>> total 0
>>>
>>> Now, I restart libvirt. And, after that virsh output is fine.
>>>
>>> $ virsh vol-list --pool default
>>> Name                 Path
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Any idea what is going on here ? Is this a known issue ?
>>>
>>
>> When you delete files behind libvirt's back, it doesn't notice.
> 
> Although, in my case, I used "virsh vol-delete" and did not go behind libvirt. And, the last instance I reported, issue happened without anything being deleted.
> 
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/2013-April/003637.html

Hmm, sorry, must have misread.

> 
>> You need to do
>>
>>   virsh vol-refresh default
> 
> Good to know.
> 

Man I really butchered this mail :) The correct command is actually

  virsh pool-refresh default

- Cole