Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

Robyn Bergeron rbergero at redhat.com
Wed May 23 16:53:54 UTC 2012


On 05/23/2012 09:50 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy at fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:duffy at fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org
>     <http://fedoraproject.org>'s front page.
>     The Installation requirements section concerns me most. I've
>     quoted the
>     current text below and my suggestions for cleaning it up. Are these
>     suggestions okay?
>
> If we follow your suggestion,
>
>     ---
>
>     "400MHz Pentium Pro or better processor (comparable AMD, Cyrix,
>     and VIA
>     processors also acceptable)"
>
>     How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better"
>
> Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we 
> are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we support.
Spot was talking with the good folks on the kernel at lists.fp.o list about 
this very thing, not sure if there is a final answer yet.
>
>     ---
>
>     "At least 768MB memory (RAM), 1GB recommended for best performance"
>
>     Be bold. Pick one. Forcing a dichotomy on the user is putting pressure
>     on them that they don't need in the wake of an OS switch.
>
>     How about "1 GB memory (RAM)"
>
> If we do this, we need to change the title from "installation 
> requirement" to "recommended setup" or something similar.
>
>
>     ---
>
>     ~m
>
>     --
>     websites mailing list
>     websites at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:websites at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -Elad Alfassa.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20120523/b6d0de14/attachment.html>


More information about the websites mailing list