<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Máirín Duffy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:duffy@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">duffy@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:<br>
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better"<br>
> ><br>
> > Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we<br>
> > are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we<br>
> > support.<br>
><br>
> "64-bit Intel-compatible system or better; 400Mhz or more."<br>
> ><br>
<br>
</div>TBH this is a lie though, we do support 686 systems, why not just say<br>
"400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better", that the default download is<br>
64-bit is spelled out pretty clearly on <a href="http://stg.fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">stg.fedoraproject.org</a>.<br>
<br>
We shouldn't pretend we can't support 32 bit when we very much can.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
~m<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div>yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended specs, not the minimal.<br>Also, I heard we now require less than 768MB of ram for install, but if we do recommended, it should be 1GB. <br>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">-Elad Alfassa.</div><br>
</div>