389-devel April 2017

389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
63 discussions

please review: 49097 pblock refactor
by William Brown 27 Apr '17

27 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49097 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3adf5b3edf54a26bd8efaab40e7ab… -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

1 0

Please review: 1 cn=config comparison in lib389
by Ankit Yadav 27 Apr '17

27 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/1 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/90d72b32e328c1537aa368c0b6a6e7cd12… Regards, Ankit Yadav (ankity10)

1 0

Please review: 1 cn=config comparison in lib389
by Ankit Yadav 27 Apr '17

27 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/1 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/a9cd8d71399a930578fc2e0e809727cb0b… Regards, Ankit Yadav (ankity10)

1 0

Branched master to 389-ds-base-1.3.6
by Mark Reynolds 26 Apr '17

26 Apr '17

Just a heads up for developers that we branched master to 389-ds-base-1.3.6. So master branch is now 1.3.7 Thanks, Mark

2 1

Please review: 21, serverid issue in lib389
by William Brown 26 Apr '17

26 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/21 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/f6d5e9b2bdbc0b95e274632abe908051ce… -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

1 0

Please review: Issue 49237 - deprecation of old libdb
by Adam Tkac 26 Apr '17

26 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49237 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e94d4e8aaa9621f96c4301ee3db12… https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/c87637e957a488a0f786edb18ab3d… The patches themselves remove support of old libdb (< 4.7). However there is still question about code in ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/upgrade.c I haven't touched it because I have no idea which on-disk libdb formats we can assume that users have. Can we, for example, assume that all existing DS installations which will upgrade to current master branch have at least libdb 4 on-disk format and newer? If yes, the upgrade.c code can be cleaned as well. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac

1 0

Please review: Issue 49234 - correctly pair dblayer_release_id2entry and dblayer_get_id2entry
by Adam Tkac 26 Apr '17

26 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49234 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/571347fd5fc794978b3c77d68a86d… Thanks in advance for review -- Adam Tkac

1 0

Please review: 26 and 49231
by William Brown 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/26 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/8f7363b1d8e2180014864f73225e24d78c… https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49231 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3881608d02496362a40c67b392f00… -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

1 0

Please review: 49233 correct psearch regression
by William Brown 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49233 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/7714e5de5c1d872bb387f286da406… -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

1 0

lib389 replica class
by William Brown 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

Hi Mark / others Given that one of our community members (ankity) is hitting up against some issues, and the function they need is in the ReplicaLegacy object, maybe it's time we bit the bullet and broke the old ReplicaObject in favour of the new one? It would be worth us sinking some time down into this improvement, as it's going to help ease people into lib389 in the future. -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-devel April 2017