389-devel March 2021

389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
37 discussions

Start a nNew thread

389 DS nightly 2021-03-23 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 23 Mar '21

23 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/23/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

failed to build rpms
by Ludwig Krispenz 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

Hi, since a long time I was trying to build rpms and failed, here are the issues I run into: 1] problem with npm/audit I followed the suggestions here: https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/contributing.html (pushd/npm fix/popd), but this didn't help, only commenting out audit-ci in src/cockpit/389-console/node_modules.mk got me over this 2] rust 2.1] rpm build failed with: error: failed to get `concread` as a dependency of package `librslapd v0.1.0 (/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/src/librslapd)` Caused by: failed to load source for dependency `concread` Caused by: Unable to update registry `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index` Caused by: failed to update replaced source registry `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index` Caused by: failed to read root of directory source: /home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/vendor Caused by: No such file or directory (os error 2) make[1]: *** [Makefile:12715: .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a] Error 101 , It was right that there wasno rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a file, not even the directory rs existed. After configuring --enable-rust the directory was created and populated. Q1: why does it try to pack rust stuff if it is not enabled ? 2.2] Now the directory was there, but I still did get the same error. A closer look showed that it was looking for .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a ,but what existed was .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/debug/librslapd.a. Note "debug" -- "release". configure was run with --enable-debug Q2: Is there somewhere a hardcoded/default assumpion of "release" ? in the cargo spec? Thanks for any suggestions Regards, Ludwig

4 4

389 DS nightly 2021-03-22 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/22/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-20 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 20 Mar '21

20 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/20/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-19 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 19 Mar '21

19 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/19/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-18 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 18 Mar '21

18 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/18/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

please review: PR 4675 - UI - Add PF4 charts for server stats
by Mark Reynolds 17 Mar '21

17 Mar '21

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4675 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-17 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 17 Mar '21

17 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/17/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-16 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 16 Mar '21

16 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/16/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

389 DS nightly 2021-03-15 - 95% PASS
by vashirov＠redhat.com 15 Mar '21

15 Mar '21

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/15/report-389-ds-b…

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-devel March 2021