On 10/21/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/10/15 11:20), Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> Thanks to William for his reviewing the patch. I'm going to push it. But
> before doing so, I have a question regarding the autogen files.
>
> The proposed patch requires to rerun autogen.sh and push the generated files
> to the git. My current env has automake 1.15 and it generates large diffs as
> attached to this email.
> -# Makefile.in generated by automake 1.13.4 from Makefile.am.
> +# Makefile.in generated by automake 1.15 from Makefile.am.
>
> Is it okay to push the attached patch
> 0002-Ticket-48285-The-dirsrv-user-group-should-be-created.patch to git or do
> we prefer to keep the diff minimum by runing autogen on the host having the
> same version of automake (1.13.4)?
>
May I ask a question; why the autotools generated files have to be stored
in git?
Because we do things the old fashioned way - we try to make it so that a
user can just use configure without having to first use autoconf/autogen.
LS
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel