[389-devel] Re: Nunc-stans status
>
> Saying that I think it would be good to have a deadline or a list
> of people we want comments from. Mark, Simon, Ludwig, Viktor,
> yourself and myself come to mind … we need to know what our
> approach is, and this ties back to the “feature gating” discussion
> that I hope you saw. We need a way to have features we are working
> on, so we can test and reason about them, but without letting them
> out in production - and having ways to roll the back.
Coming in late to the discussion... So, in this case with
nunc-stans(the new PR) I think we should do some basic sanity tests
on
it (which are occurring right now, and one issue was found which you
are
already aware of). Once these basic sanity tests pass then we
should
merge it. After that we can do the more extensive testing on it
from
master branch, but I don't want to commit something that is
completely
broken (even though the current state of NS isn't great). Anyway, I
think that's a fair compromise :-)
I agree - now lets hope that I can find a solid few days to work on
this so I can give the tests and debugging the attention it deserves
... :|