[389-devel] Re: Questions related to lib389 issue #1 cn=config

[Ankit Yadav]

After reinstalling the 389-ds-base I realized that the same error I* am
getting even if I don't setup the 389-ds-base using setup-ds-admin.pl
http://setup-ds-admin.pl*
So conclusion from above statement is When I install 389-ds-base then I do
setup using this ==> "setup-ds-admin.pl" then I am getting the error
mentioned in previous mail. And when I just install 389-ds-base and don't
do the setup then also I am getting the error mentioned in previous mail
error.

Getting same error before and after Setting up the 389-ds-base using "
setup-ds-admin.pl" means there is something wrong with my setup of
389-ds-base.

*Steps I follow to setup 389-ds-base  :*

1. Installed 389-ds-base using *sudo dnf install "389*"*
2. setup 389-ds-base using *sudo* *setup-ds-admin.pl
http://setup-ds-admin.pl*

Are these the only steps required to setup the 389-ds-base?
If the above steps are not sufficient then let me know how to setup it on
fedora 25.

Regards,
Ankit Yadav.

On 16 March 2017 at 12:46, Ankit Yadav  wrote:
> I am again getting same error
> Steps I followed:
>
> step 1 : cleaned every instance using remove-ds-admin.pl
>
> step 2: Removed 389-ds-base.
>
> step  3: Installed 389-ds-base using ==> sudo dnf install "389*"
>
> step 4: Setup 389-ds-base using "sudo setup-ds-admin.pl"
>
> step 5: Tried this command in updated lib389 repo ==>
>
> sudo PYTHONPATH=`pwd` py.test -s lib389/tests/cli/conf_backend.py
>
> step 6: Got some INFO logs and and 2 errors
>
> Errors:
> This error two times:
>
> *==================== error start =======================*
> *self = <ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser instance at 0x7efc0bcfe7e8>,
> section = 'slapd'*
> *option = 'pid_file', raw = False, vars = None*
>
> def get(self, section, option, raw=False, vars=None):*
>    """Get an option value for a given section.*
>
>        If `vars' is provided, it must be a dictionary. The option is
>
> looked up*
>        in `vars' (if provided), `section', and in `defaults' in that
>
> order.*
>        All % interpolations are expanded in the return values,
>
> unless the*
>        optional argument `raw' is true. Values for interpolation
>
> keys are*
>        looked up in the same manner as the option.*
>
>        The section DEFAULT is special.*
>        """*
>    sectiondict = {}*
>    try:*
>        sectiondict = self._sections[section]*
>    except KeyError:*
>        if section != DEFAULTSECT:*
>            raise NoSectionError(section)*
>    # Update with the entry specific variables*
>    vardict = {}*
>    if vars:*
>        for key, value in vars.items():*
>            vardict[self.optionxform(key)] = value*
>    d = _Chainmap(vardict, sectiondict, self._defaults)*
>    option = self.optionxform(option)*
>    try:*
>        value = d[option]*
>    except KeyError:*
>
> *>           raise NoOptionError(option, section)*
> *E           NoOptionError: No option 'pid_file' in section: 'slapd'*
>
> */usr/lib64/python2.7/ConfigParser.py:618: NoOptionError*
> *==================== error ends ====================*
>
> After removing all the instances this is what I am getting every time.
> What could be the possible reason for this error?
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Yadav.
>
> On 16 March 2017 at 12:18, Ankit Yadav  wrote:
> > Sorry I was travelling so was unable to try that.
> >
> > I have tried this command several times. Then I got a error like this:
> > >     except KeyError:
> > > >       raise NoOptionError(option, section)
> > >
> > > E           NoOptionError: No option 'pid_file' in section: 'slapd'
> >
> > This shows my 389-ds-base is not installed properly so,
> > I have purged all the ds instances.
> > Now I am reinstalling the 389-ds-base and then try once again.
> >
> > I will update you about this once I am done.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ankit Yadav.
> >
> > On 15 March 2017 at 13:48, William Brown  wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 12:50 +0530, Ankit Yadav wrote:
> > > > I have uninstalled that package.
> > > > There were some issues with my installation but now I am getting some
> > > > different errors.
> > >
> > > That means you already have the instance of that name: The error is
> > > still a bit rough.
> > >
> > > Try:
> > >
> > > sudo /sbin/remove-ds.pl -i slapd-standalone
> > >
> > > Then run the test again.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > William Brown
> > > Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
> > >
> > > 389-devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]