Leroy Tennison wrote:
The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was
disappointed. The features seemed limited and rudimentary. You had
to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to
dynamically supply a different one. If there is a more robust
alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it. If not please
consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server
in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited.
Thanks for any and all replies.
I don't know of any. What are some of the features you would like to
see in pam_ldap: the next generation?
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list