stable/dev branches

[Stanislav Levin]

Hello.

Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
But it is not updated since July, too stable?

1.4.x branches in upstream:

upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
  upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
  upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
  upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
  upstream/master

Any plans on supporting these?
Which one is stable now?

Thanks.

[Mark Reynolds]

On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> But it is not updated since July, too stable?
>
> 1.4.x branches in upstream:
>
> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1

This is no longer being maintained
> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2

This branch is about to stop being maintained
> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3

This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
>    upstream/master

1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge 
changes and features.

HTH,

Mark
> Any plans on supporting these?
> Which one is stable now?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 389-devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]....

[Stanislav Levin]

03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> > But it is not updated since July, too stable?
> >
> > 1.4.x branches in upstream:
> >
> > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
>
> This is no longer being maintained
> > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
>
> This branch is about to stop being maintained
> > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
>
> This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
> >   upstream/master
>
> 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge
> changes and features.
>
> HTH,
>
> Mark

It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at
time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.

Thank you very much!

[William Brown]

> On 3 Nov 2020, at 23:50, Stanislav Levin  wrote:
>
> 03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> > On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> > > But it is not updated since July, too stable?
> > >
> > > 1.4.x branches in upstream:
> > >
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
> >
> > This is no longer being maintained
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
> >
> > This branch is about to stop being maintained
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
> >
> > This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
> > >  upstream/master
> >
> > 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge
> > changes and features.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Mark
>
> It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at
> time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.

It's a good point Mark, maybe we need to be able to tag dev streams from release streams as 2.0.0 is a "future release" branch at this point.

It could also help to have a list of "supported streams" on the front page of the wiki too ...

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs, Australia

[Mark Reynolds]

On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> 03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> > On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> > > But it is not updated since July, too stable?
> > >
> > > 1.4.x branches in upstream:
> > >
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
> >
> > This is no longer being maintained
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
> >
> > This branch is about to stop being maintained
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
> >
> > This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
> > >    upstream/master
> >
> > 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge
> > changes and features.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Mark
>
> It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at
> time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.

We follow the Fedora release schedule:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases?rd=Releases/

So...

F34(rawhide) --> 389-ds-base-2.0.0

F33 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.4

F32 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.3

F31 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.2

Now F31 is probably going to be EOLed sooner than later, so we will stop 
maintaining 1.4.2 at that time.

I will add something to the landing page of our wiki about this topic.

Regards,
Mark
> Thank you very much!

[Stanislav Levin]

11.11.2020 22:03, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > 03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> > > On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> > > > But it is not updated since July, too stable?
> > > >
> > > > 1.4.x branches in upstream:
> > > >
> > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
> > >
> > > This is no longer being maintained
> > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
> > >
> > > This branch is about to stop being maintained
> > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
> > >
> > > This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
> > > >    upstream/master
> > >
> > > 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge
> > > changes and features.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> > It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at
> > time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.
>
> We follow the Fedora release schedule:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases?rd=Releases/
>
> So...
>
> F34(rawhide) --> 389-ds-base-2.0.0
>
> F33 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.4
>
> F32 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.3
>
> F31 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.2
>
> Now F31 is probably going to be EOLed sooner than later, so we will stop
> maintaining 1.4.2 at that time.
>
> I will add something to the landing page of our wiki about this topic.

Hi! Any news on this?
Could you please point me to which branch is current stable or LTS?

Thanks.

[Mark Reynolds]

On 8/11/21 9:23 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> 11.11.2020 22:03, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> > On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > > 03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:
> > > > On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
> > > > > Hello.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux.
> > > > > But it is not updated since July, too stable?
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.4.x branches in upstream:
> > > > >
> > > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1
> > > >
> > > > This is no longer being maintained
> > > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2
> > > >
> > > > This branch is about to stop being maintained
> > > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3
> > > >
> > > > This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.
> > > > > upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4
> > > > >     upstream/master
> > > >
> > > > 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge
> > > > changes and features.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > >
> > > It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at
> > > time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.
> >
> > We follow the Fedora release schedule:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases?rd=Releases/
> >
> > So...
> >
> > F34(rawhide) --> 389-ds-base-2.0.0
> >
> > F33 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.4
> >
> > F32 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.3
> >
> > F31 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.2
> >
> > Now F31 is probably going to be EOLed sooner than later, so we will stop
> > maintaining 1.4.2 at that time.
> >
> > I will add something to the landing page of our wiki about this topic.
>
> Hi! Any news on this?
> Could you please point me to which branch is current stable or LTS?

389-ds-base-1.4.3 and 1.4.4 are the most stable, 389-ds-base-2.0 and 
master branch are still under heavy development.

HTH,

Mark
> Thanks.
>
> 389-devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]....
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure