[Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ?

[William.Zhang]

 thanks in advance.
���������������������j(�������������������m���)��ｗ(��

[Rich Megginson]

We don't have any published performance numbers or benchmarks. We're
working on putting something together. But in the meantime, I will say that
1) FDS performs good enough for any application where read/search
performance is more critical than write performance (otherwise, use an
RDBMS)
2) FDS is faster, scales better, and is more reliable than most LDAP servers
3) No LDAP server performs significantly better than FDS - in certain
cases under certain conditions, some LDAP servers perform very slightly
better, and that usually requires a lot of careful config file tuning


William.Zhang wrote:

>  thanks in advance.
> �������������������������������������痂b�j(�������������������������������������m���r�)�扫hｗ(���
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
> Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>   
>

[William.Zhang]

Thanks for your reply.
In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory
server. 
so i want some data of performance of these two.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion."
<fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com&gt;
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora
DS ?


>  --
>  Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
>  Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
> ���������������������j(�������������������m���)��ｗ(��

[Pete Rowley]

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: fedora-directory-devel-bounces(a)redhat.com 
>  [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf 
>  Of William.Zhang
>  Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 PM
>  To: Fedora Directory server developer discussion.
>  Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the 
>  documentofperformance of fedora DS ?
>  
>  Thanks for your reply.
>  In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS 
>  and other Sun ONE directory server. 
>  so i want some data of performance of these two. 
The answer to that is substantially similar - given that they were the same server not so
long ago :)

>  
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." 
>  <fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the 
>  documentof performance of fedora DS ?
>  
>  
>  > --
>  > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
>  > Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
>  > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>  >痂b嫎j(?
?m?r鎗)扫hｗ(??
>  
>  --
>  Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
>  Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>

[Rich Megginson]

William.Zhang wrote:

> Thanks for your reply.
> In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory
> server. 
> so i want some data of performance of these two.
>   
>  
The performance of the two is roughly the same. I don't know if you were
aware, but Sun does not allow third parties to publish performance
comparisons between Sun DS and other LDAP servers - it violates the
terms of the Sun DS license agreement. So, unless Sun has published
performance specs, you probably won't find any.

You'll have to base your decision on something other than performance.

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins(a)redhat.com&gt;
> To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion."
> <fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com&gt;
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora
> DS ?
>
>
>   
>
> >--
> >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
> &gt;Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
> >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
> >�������������������������������������痂b�j(�������������������������������������m���r�)�扫hｗ(���
> >    
> >
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
> Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>   
>

[William.Zhang]

Dear :


thank you very much , i do know nothing of the license.

-----------------
Regards.
Zhang Zhi Wei

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rich Megginson 
To: Fedora Directory server developer discussion. 
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has thedocumentof performance of fedora
DS ?


William.Zhang wrote: 
Thanks for your reply.
In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory
server. 
so i want some data of performance of these two.
  
The performance of the two is roughly the same.  I don't know if you were aware, but
Sun does not allow third parties to publish performance comparisons between Sun DS and
other LDAP servers - it violates the terms of the Sun DS license agreement.  So, unless
Sun has published performance specs, you probably won't find any.

You'll have to base your decision on something other than performance.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion."
<fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com&gt;
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora
DS ?


  
--
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-develÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ...