[Fedora-directory-users] Infinite loop during installation process
by Graham Leggett
Hi all,
I am trying to set up a new FDS v1.0.3 install under RHEL4, adding this
server to an existing configuration domain.
About half way through the install, I am asked if I would like to add
sample entries to my server.
I say "No". The screen clears. After a while I press "enter" to see if
there is any progress on the install. The screen clears again and the
same "Do you want to install the sample entries?" appears.
I say "No". Rinse repeat.
Has anyone encountered this before? Is there a workaround for this? So
far it seems the installer is terminally broken.
Regards,
Graham
--
17 years, 4 months
[Fedora-directory-users] Cannot uninstall fedora-ds v1.0.2
by Graham Leggett
Hi all,
In an attempt to bring my new server back to some semblance of
operation, I try to uninstall fedora-ds v1.0.2.
This is because no option exists to reconfigure the server once configured.
This attempt hangs. When ctl-c is used to break, fedora-ds fails like so:
[root@rachel ~]# rpm -e fedora-ds
Interrupt [2]. Uninstallation aborts.
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10197: line 8: 6168 Segmentation fault
./uninstall -s -force
error: %preun(fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.RHEL4.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
status 139
Regards,
Graham
--
17 years, 4 months
[Fedora-directory-users] help
by aku ackumey
hi i'm new in fedora-ds and have followed instructions
but when i want to start the admin server i get this
error httpd.worker: Syntax error on line 128 of
/opt/fedora-ds/admin-serv/config/httpd.conf: Cannot
load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_access.so into server:
/etc/httpd/modules/mod_access.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory please help me
thanks in advance.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
17 years, 4 months
[Fedora-directory-users] I need Help in FDS warnings & Connection with Samba
by Junaid
Hi all,
i have installed Fedora Directory server.when i do ./startconsole -u admin -a http://localhost.localdomain:786/ , it gives warning that
GC warning: Out of memory Returning NIL!
GC warning: Out of memory Returning NIL!
GC warning: Out of memory Returning NIL!
***catastropic failure while handling uncaught exceptions.
i wana ask that does this command works even the warning are comming? and how can i configure samba with FDS so that the Samba Primary Domain Server can authanticate from FDS. Please guide me.Thankx
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited Try it today.
17 years, 4 months
[Fedora-directory-users] Second infinite loop during installation process
by Graham Leggett
Hi all,
Another infinite loop - if typical install is chosen, and the config is
being added to an existing server, the machine name, port, username and
password is requested.
The error message "Could not find the Admin Domain domain.com in the
server" is shown. This message is correct - the admin domain is not
"domain.com" in this case.
At this point, the most logical course of action is to ask the user for
the name of the admin domain. Instead, the setup loops round asking for
the name of the machine, port, username and password as if the domain is
going to be any different this time.
Rinse repeat.
If the information is entered again, random characters start to appear
behind the printed machine name.
This can be worked around by choosing "custom installation", but custom
installation is broken due to the previously mentioned infinite loop
while (not) adding sample entries.
Regards,
Graham
--
17 years, 4 months
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problems Setting up 1.0.3
by Mike Jackson
"Chris St. Pierre" <stpierre(a)NebrWesleyan.edu> kirjoitti:
>
> I guess you did say, though, that the problem _only_ happens to
> SSL-enabled machines, not that it _always_ happens to SSL-enabled
> machines. Still, hope this helps you root out the problem.
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Richard Megginson wrote:
>
> > It appears that the permission problem only happens with servers that were
> > configured to use SSL in fds102 and upgraded to fds103. Can anyone confirm the
> > problem occurred in a system not using SSL?
My server (laptop) had not ever been configured to use SSL.
--
mike
17 years, 5 months
[Fedora-directory-users] Windows sync on more than 1 domain controller
by Bliss, Aaron
Hi everyone,
I'm sure like most shops out there, we have multiple domain controllers
in our 2003 ad environment; is it necessary to install the pass sync
service on each domain controller (as I understand ad's multimaster
environment to work, there is no guarantee which domain controller a
user will hit when they change their password); please advise and
thanks.
Aaron
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.
17 years, 5 months
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem accessing Configuration Directory after upgrade to 1.0.3
by Dan
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 12:56 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
I don't think that the password thing is necessarily a problem depending
> on how mod_nss is configured. I'm more curious what is logged on the
> LDAP side. Is the admin server attempting to open a connection? If so,
> how is it failing?
>
> rob
>
The admin server is attempting to open a connection. From the access log:
---
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from
192.168.55.1 to 192.168.55.1
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 SSL 128-bit RC4
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin-serv-ldap,
cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn=Server Group, cn=ldap.example.net,
ou=example.net, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128 version=2
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
nentries=0 etime=0 dn=""
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=1 SRCH base="cn=configuration,
cn=admin-serv-ldap, cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn=Server Group,
cn=ldap.example.net, ou=example.net, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0
filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryInfo)" attrs=ALL
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=0 etime=0
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=2 UNBIND
[02/Nov/2006:14:20:02 -0500] conn=5 op=2 fd=64 closed - U1
---
I ran the same query manually and this is successful:
---
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from
192.168.55.1 to 192.168.55.1
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 SSL 128-bit RC4
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin-serv-ldap,
cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn=Server Group, cn=ldap.example.net,
ou=example.net, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128 version=3
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=admin-serv-ldap,cn=fedora administration
server,cn=server
group,cn=ldap.example.net,ou=example.net,o=netscaperoot"
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=1 SRCH base="cn=configuration,
cn=admin-serv-ldap, cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn=Server Group,
cn=ldap.example.net, ou=example.net, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0
filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryInfo)" attrs=ALL
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=2 UNBIND
[02/Nov/2006:14:22:55 -0500] conn=7 op=2 fd=64 closed - U1
---
I notice 2 differences. The BIND is using version 2 when trying to
start the admin server. That shouldn't matter.
The problem seems to be with the BIND'ing. When trying to start the
admin server, the RESULT to the BIND contains an empty dn. When run
manually, the dn is correct.
It seems like it is not authenticating properly with FDS 1.0.3.
17 years, 5 months