March 2006 - 389-users - Fedora Mailing-Lists

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

I believe this is what your looking for, here is an example when I intentionally attempt to break the password rules: [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 et ime=0 [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 MOD dn="uid=awbtest,ou=users,dc=pre ferredcare,dc=org", invalid password syntax Here is the error that occurred during the upgrade (I wouldn't worry too much about the entries below that reference fds1 instead of al-lnx-s11, I manually typed that after pasting the error log, as I wasn't comfortable displaying the real server name, but it doesn't really matter now, the real server name is al-lnx-s11) [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 BIND dn="uid=admin, ou=Administrators, ou=TopologyManagement, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128 version=3 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 SRCH base="cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare. org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=nsAppl ication)(nsNickName=slapd)(nsInstalledLocation=/opt/fedora-ds))" attrs="* aci pa sswordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime ac countUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThrough Limit nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passwordExpirationTime pas swordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnlockTime password History passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit nsSizeLimit nsTime Limit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 MOD dn="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn= Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeR oot" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 RESULT err=0 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=1 filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryServer)" attrs="* aci passwordEx pirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnl ockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit ns SizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 SRCH base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11, cn=Fedo ra Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=prefer redcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passw ordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accou ntUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLim it nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 SRCH base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedo ra Directory Server,cn=Server Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferred care.org,o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passwordE xpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUn lockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit n sSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime= 0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime =0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 MOD dn="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcar e.org,o=NetscapeRoot", invalid password syntax -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:06 AM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy >(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password >that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password >is not accepted. >[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 > > Can you find out what this operation is? It's either an ADD or MOD - just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10". I'd like to know what the DN is. >So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's >still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, >Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only >happened during the upgrade >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password >schema is being used? > >Thanks. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Cc: Bliss, Aaron >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >>something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >>much. >> >>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >>(19:Constraint violation) >>Configuring Administration Server... >>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. >> >>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the >>new >> >> > > > >>password enforcement options seem to be available. >> >> >> >> >Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint >violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. > > > >>Aaron >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bliss, Aaron >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Ah, thanks again. >> >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>>do >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy >>them >> >> > > > >>in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the >>correct >> >> > > > >>version of directory server. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>>Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>Megginson >>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>>fds >>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>> >>>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>>just >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >>> >>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>>follow >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>the prompts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Aaron >>>> >>>>www.preferredcare.org >>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>Power and Associates >>>> >>>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of >>>this >>> >>> > > > >>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication >>>in >>> >>> > > > >>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>>the copies you received. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-- >>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-directory-users] failed to install a local copy of ds10.jar (after upgrade to 1.0.2)

by Gökhan Afacan

Hello. I have upgraded my directory to 1.0.2. I can startconsole but when I click on Directory Server node, I get the following error message: "Installing server components downloading ds10.jar (0k)" After a while it says: "Failed to install a local copy of ds10.jar or one of its supporting files: can not connect to http://localhost:3060" What is the problem? Operating system information is: fedora core 4, 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4smp java -version is: 1.5.0_06 I used the below link to install java 1.5 to get a solution for the problem : http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/index.php/JPackage_Java_for_FC4 But it did not work. Thanks for your help.

18 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy (require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password is not accepted. [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only happened during the upgrade [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password schema is being used? Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Cc: Bliss, Aaron Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >much. > >Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >(19:Constraint violation) >Configuring Administration Server... >InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. > >The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new >password enforcement options seem to be available. > > Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. >Aaron >-----Original Message----- >From: Bliss, Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Ah, thanks again. > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>do >> >> > > > >>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them >in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct >version of directory server. > > > >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>just >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >> >>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>follow >> >> > > > >>the prompts. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

18 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-directory-users] failed to install a local copy of ds10.jar (after upgrade to 1.0.2)

by A G

Hello. I have upgraded my directory to 1.0.2. I can startconsole but when I click on Directory Server node, I get the following error message: "Installing server components downloading ds10.jar (0k)" After a while it says: "Failed to install a local copy of ds10.jar or one of its supporting files: can not connect to http://localhost:3060" What is the problem? Operating system information is: fedora core 4, 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4smp java -version is: 1.5.0_06 I used the below link to install java 1.5 to get a solution for the problem : http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/index.php/JPackage_Java_for_FC4 But it did not work. Thanks for your help.

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only happened during the upgrade [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password schema is being used? Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Cc: Bliss, Aaron Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >much. > >Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >(19:Constraint violation) >Configuring Administration Server... >InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. > >The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new >password enforcement options seem to be available. > > Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. >Aaron >-----Original Message----- >From: Bliss, Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Ah, thanks again. > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>do >> >> > > > >>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them >in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct >version of directory server. > > > >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>just >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >> >>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>follow >> >> > > > >>the prompts. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very much. Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot (19:Constraint violation) Configuring Administration Server... InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new password enforcement options seem to be available. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Ah, thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to do >this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. > > Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct version of directory server. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>just >> >> > > > >>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >> >> >> >> >Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. > >After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and follow >the prompts. > > > >>Aaron >> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-directory-users] getlocalsid: adding domain info...failed

by Mont Rothstein

I am trying to integrate Fedora Directory Server (1.0.1) and Samba (3.0.10) on RHEL ES4. When I execute "net getlocalsid" I get the following: [2006/03/07 17:55:29, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(1392) Adding domain info for WORKGROUP failed with NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL SID for domain RHELES4RS1 is: S-1-5-21-807157010-1821471989-4121009367 My workgroup is currently set to workgroup and I can perform an ldapsearch. I saw one refernce on the web to ignore this, but I was skeptical. What could be causing this error? Is there something in FDS that I failed to do (I haven't done anything beyond the basic install). I'm stuck on this, any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks, -Mont

18 years, 1 month

1
1
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

I have 1 more question; looking at the new password policy options, what is the difference between required special characters and required alpha characters? Are alpha characters integers and special characters keys such as #$% Thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Ah, thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to do >this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. > > Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct version of directory server. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>just >> >> > > > >>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >> >> >> >> >Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. > >After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and follow >the prompts. > > > >>Aaron >> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

Sorry about the previous post, I just checked the release notes, looks like special characters are $@# etc, digit character are integers, alpha characters are just letters. Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:32 PM To: Bliss, Aaron; General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 I have 1 more question; looking at the new password policy options, what is the difference between required special characters and required alpha characters? Are alpha characters integers and special characters keys such as #$% Thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bliss, Aaron Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Ah, thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to do >this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. > > Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct version of directory server. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>just >> >> > > > >>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >> >> >> >> >Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. > >After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and follow >the prompts. > > > >>Aaron >> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

by Bliss, Aaron

Ah, thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to do >this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. > > Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct version of directory server. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>just >> >> > > > >>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >> >> >> >> >Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. > >After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and follow >the prompts. > > > >>Aaron >> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users March 2006