389-users April 2012

389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

30 participants
41 discussions

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Rich Megginson 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

On 04/11/2012 08:19 AM, MATON Brett wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. > > For the record, status 32 was an error on my part, I hadn’t quoted > the bind DN so ldapsearch was actually complaining about the bind DN > not being found, not the backup task. > > Noriko, I’ve searched “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” and can’t find > nstaskstatus anywhere. I’m assuming that it also gets deleted once > the task is complete... > > > cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config is the parent entry for all backup task > entries. When you create an entry under this parent, it starts the > backup task. It is the backup task entry that has the nsTaskStatus > attribute, not the parent entry "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config". When > the backup task is complete, and the ttl is expired, the backup task > entry is automatically removed. > > > Hi Rich, I appreciate your clarification. I did however mean that I > was searching “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” with no additional > filters which should have returned everything, nsTaskStatus included > for any backup job? > > Exactly what search parameters (e.g. ldapsearch command line > arguments) did you use? > > I might just be having a dumb moment but I couldn’t think of an > efficient way to check the error log for a Backup Finished entry, > anyone with suggestions? > > > The best way is to do the ldapsearch as described above. > > > I’m still having issues, $taskDN for example would be something like > cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config > > > COUNT=1 > > while [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; do > > # > > # OOPS: -b ${taskDN} > > # -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "cn=<task>" > > # > > COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ${HOST} -D "${BINDAS}" -y ${PWFILE} > -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(${taskDN})" dn | grep -c '^dn') > > so this would expand to something like > COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ldap.example.com -D "cn=directory manager" -y > pwfile.txt -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" > "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" dn | > grep -c '^dn') > > This is incorrect in the following ways: > 1) the argument to -H must be a valid LDAP URL - so -H > ldap://ldap.example.com $HOST is just a variable name, it’s actually > the URL > 2) "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" is > not a valid LDAP search filter - if you want to search for the backup > entry, do one of the following > a) ldapsearch ... -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, > cn=tasks, cn=config" ... > or > b) ldapsearch ... -b "cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" > "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23)" ... > > OK, search terms corrected. > > The command expands to and returns this: > > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -y > /root/.389ds-pw -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_28_40, cn=backup, > cn=tasks, cn=config" > > # extended LDIF > > # > > # LDAPv3 > > # base <cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_28_40, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config> > with scope baseObject > > # filter: (objectclass=*) > > # requesting: ALL > > # > > # search result > > search: 2 > > result: 32 No such object > > # numResponses: 1 > > > I tweaked the db2bak.pl script to include ttl: 600 as I wanted some > time to examine the backup task entry and search results: > > ... > > $dn = "dn: cn=$taskname, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config\n"; > > $misc = "changetype: add\nobjectclass: top\nobjectclass: > extensibleObject\n*ttl: 600\n*"; > > $cn = "cn: $taskname\n"; > ... > > The entry gets added, but still disappears near instantaneously > (db2bak.pl called standalone for output): > > Back up directory: > /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<host>/bak/<host>-2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > ldap_initialize( <DEFAULT> ) > > add objectclass: > > top > > extensibleObject > > add ttl: > > 600 > > add cn: > > backup_2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > add nsArchiveDir: > > /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<host>/bak/<host>-2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > add nsDatabaseType: > > ldbm database > > adding new entry "cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_42_4, cn=backup, cn=tasks, > cn=config" > > modify complete > > As you can see from the ls output below, tar is still being called > before the task has completed: > > [root@<host> backup]# ls -ltr > > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 6788 Apr 11 07:28 20120411072840-<host>.tgz > > drwx------. 5 nobody nobody 4096 Apr 11 07:28 20120411072840-<host> > > Thanks for your time.... > > ok - I'd like you to try two more things: > 1) alter your search parameters - do this instead: > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -y > /root/.389ds-pw -b "cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" > do you see anything? > > Ok this is a bit freaky: > > Executing db2pk.pl manually from the command line I get this in > /var/log/dirsrv/<instance>/error: > > [11/Apr/2012:15:33:11 +0200] - Beginning backup of 'ldbm database' > > [11/Apr/2012:15:33:12 +0200] - Backing up file 35 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>/bak/<instance>-2012_4_11_15_33_12/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/6b85db82-5df911e1-ab138798-28541438_4f45faa60000004b0000.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:33:12 +0200] - Backing up file 36 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>/bak/<instance>-2012_4_11_15_33_12/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:33:12 +0200] - Backup finished. > > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<instance>.nrb.be:636 -D "cn=Directory > Manager" -y /root/.389ds-pw -b > "cn=backup_2012_4_11_15_33_12,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" > # extended LDIF > > # > > # LDAPv3 > > # base <cn=backup_2012_4_11_15_33_12,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config> > with scope subtree > > # filter: (objectclass=*) > > # requesting: ALL > > # > > # backup_2012_4_11_15_33_12, backup, tasks, config > > dn: cn=backup_2012_4_11_15_33_12,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > > objectClass: top > > objectClass: extensibleObject > > ttl: 600 > > cn: backup_2012_4_11_15_33_12 > > nsarchivedir: > /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>/bak/<instance>-2012_4_11_15_33_12 > > nsdatabasetype: ldbm database > > nstaskcurrentitem: 0 > > nstasktotalitems: 1 > > nstasklog:: <snipped> > > nstaskstatus: Backup finished. > > nstaskexitcode: 0 > > # search result > > search: 2 > > result: 0 Success > > # numResponses: 2 > > # numEntries: 1 > > Scripted version: > > /var/log/dirsrv/<instance>/error: > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:06 +0200] - Beginning backup of 'ldbm database' > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 1 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/telephoneNumber.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 2 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/ntUserDomainId.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 3 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/numsubordinates.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 4 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/objectclass.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 5 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/mail.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 6 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/ntUniqueId.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 7 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/parentid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 8 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/aci.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 9 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/cn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 10 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/seeAlso.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 11 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/entryrdn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 12 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/uid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 13 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/ancestorid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 14 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/givenName.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 15 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/sn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 16 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/uniquemember.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 17 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/nsuniqueid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 18 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/nscpEntryDN.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 19 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/id2entry.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 20 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/userRoot/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 21 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/numsubordinates.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 22 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/objectclass.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 23 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/parentid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 24 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/aci.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 25 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/cn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 26 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/entryrdn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 27 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/uid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 28 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/ancestorid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 29 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/givenName.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 30 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/sn.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 31 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/uniquemember.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 32 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/nsuniqueid.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 33 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/id2entry.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 34 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/NetscapeRoot/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 35 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/6b85db82-5df911e1-ab138798-28541438_4f45faa60000004b0000.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 36 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 37 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/log.0000000018) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backing up file 38 > (/usr/backup/20120411153507-nrbnrl0075/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:15:35:07 +0200] - Backup finished. > > Search result: > > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636-D "cn=Directory Manager" -y > /root/.389ds-pw -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_11_15_35_7, cn=backup, > cn=tasks, cn=config" > > # extended LDIF > > # > > # LDAPv3 > > # base <cn=backup_2012_4_11_15_35_7, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config> > with scope baseObject > > # filter: (objectclass=*) > > # requesting: ALL > > # > > # search result > > search: 2 > > result: 32 No such object > > # numResponses: 1 > > Search without taskid: > > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636-D "cn=Directory Manager" -y > /root/.389ds-pw -s base -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" > > # extended LDIF > > # > > # LDAPv3 > > # base <cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config> with scope baseObject > > # filter: (objectclass=*) > > # requesting: ALL > > # > > # backup, tasks, config > > dn: cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > > objectClass: top > > objectClass: extensibleObject > > cn: backup > > # search result > > search: 2 > > result: 0 Success > > # numResponses: 2 > > # numEntries: 1 > > The only difference I can see is that the scripted version specifies a > backup path with the –a option > > Another test including the –a option from the command line: > > [11/Apr/2012:16:10:31 +0200] - Beginning backup of 'ldbm database' > > [11/Apr/2012:16:10:31 +0200] - Backing up file 35 > (/tmp/test/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/6b85db82-5df911e1-ab138798-28541438_4f45faa60000004b0000.db4) > > [11/Apr/2012:16:10:31 +0200] - Backing up file 36 > (/tmp/test/.repl_changelog_backup/changelogdb/DBVERSION) > > [11/Apr/2012:16:10:31 +0200] - Backup finished. > > ldapsearch does return the backup task, although the error log is only > listing backup files 35 / 36 I created tgz’s of the backups and both > command line / scripted version were identical in size. > Even more confused J > As am I. I'm just not sure what's going on, nor do I know why adding -a would make any difference here. If you think there is a bug here, please file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/389 > > 2) can you confirm using the errors log (manually, not automated with > a script) that your backup task was started successfully and completes > successfully? Just to be sure that it is indeed being started and > finishing correctly > > Error logs above. > > if [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; then > > sleep 5s > > fi > > done > > tar czf ${BACKUPPATH}${BKTSTAMP}-${INSTANCE}.tgz -C / ${DSBACKUPDIR#/*} > > However the tar file is incomplete, because (assumption) the backup > has not finished writing to disk before tar starts.... > > For the time being I’ve settled on two scripts, one to start backups > and another to archive yesterdays (or older) backups. Not ideal but > workable > > Thanks again, > > Brett > > *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org> > [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of > *Noriko Hosoi > *Sent:* 05 April 2012 18:40 > *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > *Subject:* Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished? > > You could search the task.with nstaskstatus attribute. > > $ ldapsearch -LLLx -h localhost -p <port> -D 'cn=directory manager' -w > <pw> -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_*)" nstaskstatus > > When the task is done, you'll see the "Backup finished." status: > dn: cn=backup_2012_4_5_9_35_35,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > nstaskstatus: Backup finished. > > Another way would be checking the errors log, which logs the end of > the back up. > > > > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backing up file 31 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-totoro/bak/totoro-2012_4_5_9_32_8/DBVERSION) > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backup finished. > > Thanks, > --noriko > MATON Brett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I want to tar up the backup set once a db2bak.pl backup job has finished. > > however because it writes an entry to the LDAP and doesn’t wait for > the backup to finish I was wondering what the best way to determine > when the backup has actually finished? > > I was thinking that I could > > Ldapsearch at intervals for the backup cn entry, when it’s not there > anymore backup has finished > > Ro maybe watch the audit log for a delete action on the backup cn entry.. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ >

1 0

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Rich Megginson 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

On 04/10/2012 11:46 PM, MATON Brett wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. > > For the record, status 32 was an error on my part, I hadn’t quoted > the bind DN so ldapsearch was actually complaining about the bind DN > not being found, not the backup task. > > Noriko, I’ve searched “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” and can’t find > nstaskstatus anywhere. I’m assuming that it also gets deleted once > the task is complete... > > > cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config is the parent entry for all backup task > entries. When you create an entry under this parent, it starts the > backup task. It is the backup task entry that has the nsTaskStatus > attribute, not the parent entry "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config". When > the backup task is complete, and the ttl is expired, the backup task > entry is automatically removed. > > > Hi Rich, I appreciate your clarification. I did however mean that I > was searching “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” with no additional > filters which should have returned everything, nsTaskStatus included > for any backup job? > > Exactly what search parameters (e.g. ldapsearch command line > arguments) did you use? > > I might just be having a dumb moment but I couldn’t think of an > efficient way to check the error log for a Backup Finished entry, > anyone with suggestions? > > > The best way is to do the ldapsearch as described above. > > > I’m still having issues, $taskDN for example would be something like > cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config > > > COUNT=1 > > while [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; do > > # > > # OOPS: -b ${taskDN} > > # -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "cn=<task>" > > # > > COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ${HOST} -D "${BINDAS}" -y ${PWFILE} > -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(${taskDN})" dn | grep -c '^dn') > > so this would expand to something like > COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ldap.example.com -D "cn=directory manager" -y > pwfile.txt -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" > "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" dn | > grep -c '^dn') > > This is incorrect in the following ways: > 1) the argument to -H must be a valid LDAP URL - so -H > ldap://ldap.example.com $HOST is just a variable name, it’s actually > the URL > 2) "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" is > not a valid LDAP search filter - if you want to search for the backup > entry, do one of the following > a) ldapsearch ... -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, > cn=tasks, cn=config" ... > or > b) ldapsearch ... -b "cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" > "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23)" ... > > OK, search terms corrected. > > The command expands to and returns this: > > ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -y > /root/.389ds-pw -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_28_40, cn=backup, > cn=tasks, cn=config" > > # extended LDIF > > # > > # LDAPv3 > > # base <cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_28_40, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config> > with scope baseObject > > # filter: (objectclass=*) > > # requesting: ALL > > # > > # search result > > search: 2 > > result: 32 No such object > > # numResponses: 1 > > > I tweaked the db2bak.pl script to include ttl: 600 as I wanted some > time to examine the backup task entry and search results: > > ... > > $dn = "dn: cn=$taskname, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config\n"; > > $misc = "changetype: add\nobjectclass: top\nobjectclass: > extensibleObject\n*ttl: 600\n*"; > > $cn = "cn: $taskname\n"; > ... > > The entry gets added, but still disappears near instantaneously > (db2bak.pl called standalone for output): > > Back up directory: > /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<host>/bak/<host>-2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > ldap_initialize( <DEFAULT> ) > > add objectclass: > > top > > extensibleObject > > add ttl: > > 600 > > add cn: > > backup_2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > add nsArchiveDir: > > /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<host>/bak/<host>-2012_4_11_7_42_4 > > add nsDatabaseType: > > ldbm database > > adding new entry "cn=backup_2012_4_11_7_42_4, cn=backup, cn=tasks, > cn=config" > > modify complete > > As you can see from the ls output below, tar is still being called > before the task has completed: > > [root@<host> backup]# ls -ltr > > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 6788 Apr 11 07:28 20120411072840-<host>.tgz > > drwx------. 5 nobody nobody 4096 Apr 11 07:28 20120411072840-<host> > > Thanks for your time.... > ok - I'd like you to try two more things: 1) alter your search parameters - do this instead: ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://<host fqdn>:636 -D "cn=Directory Manager" -y /root/.389ds-pw -b "cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" do you see anything? 2) can you confirm using the errors log (manually, not automated with a script) that your backup task was started successfully and completes successfully? Just to be sure that it is indeed being started and finishing correctly > > if [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; then > > sleep 5s > > fi > > done > > tar czf ${BACKUPPATH}${BKTSTAMP}-${INSTANCE}.tgz -C / ${DSBACKUPDIR#/*} > > However the tar file is incomplete, because (assumption) the backup > has not finished writing to disk before tar starts.... > > For the time being I’ve settled on two scripts, one to start backups > and another to archive yesterdays (or older) backups. Not ideal but > workable > > Thanks again, > > Brett > > *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org> > [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of > *Noriko Hosoi > *Sent:* 05 April 2012 18:40 > *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > *Subject:* Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished? > > You could search the task.with nstaskstatus attribute. > > $ ldapsearch -LLLx -h localhost -p <port> -D 'cn=directory manager' -w > <pw> -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_*)" nstaskstatus > > When the task is done, you'll see the "Backup finished." status: > dn: cn=backup_2012_4_5_9_35_35,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > nstaskstatus: Backup finished. > > Another way would be checking the errors log, which logs the end of > the back up. > > > > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backing up file 31 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-totoro/bak/totoro-2012_4_5_9_32_8/DBVERSION) > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backup finished. > > Thanks, > --noriko > MATON Brett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I want to tar up the backup set once a db2bak.pl backup job has finished. > > however because it writes an entry to the LDAP and doesn’t wait for > the backup to finish I was wondering what the best way to determine > when the backup has actually finished? > > I was thinking that I could > > Ldapsearch at intervals for the backup cn entry, when it’s not there > anymore backup has finished > > Ro maybe watch the audit log for a delete action on the backup cn entry.. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ >

1 0

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Rich Megginson 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

On 04/10/2012 07:25 AM, MATON Brett wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. > > For the record, status 32 was an error on my part, I hadn’t quoted > the bind DN so ldapsearch was actually complaining about the bind DN > not being found, not the backup task. > > Noriko, I’ve searched “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” and can’t find > nstaskstatus anywhere. I’m assuming that it also gets deleted once > the task is complete... > > > cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config is the parent entry for all backup task > entries. When you create an entry under this parent, it starts the > backup task. It is the backup task entry that has the nsTaskStatus > attribute, not the parent entry "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config". When > the backup task is complete, and the ttl is expired, the backup task > entry is automatically removed. > > Hi Rich, I appreciate your clarification. I did however mean that I > was searching “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” with no additional > filters which should have returned everything, nsTaskStatus included > for any backup job? > Exactly what search parameters (e.g. ldapsearch command line arguments) did you use? > > I might just be having a dumb moment but I couldn’t think of an > efficient way to check the error log for a Backup Finished entry, > anyone with suggestions? > > > The best way is to do the ldapsearch as described above. > > I’m still having issues, $taskDN for example would be something like > cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config > > > COUNT=1 > > while [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; do > > # > > # OOPS: -b ${taskDN} > > # -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "cn=<task>" > > # > > COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ${HOST} -D "${BINDAS}" -y ${PWFILE} > -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(${taskDN})" dn | grep -c '^dn') > so this would expand to something like COUNT=$(ldapsearch -x -H ldap.example.com -D "cn=directory manager" -y pwfile.txt -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" dn | grep -c '^dn') This is incorrect in the following ways: 1) the argument to -H must be a valid LDAP URL - so -H ldap://ldap.example.com 2) "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config)" is not a valid LDAP search filter - if you want to search for the backup entry, do one of the following a) ldapsearch ... -s base -b "cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23, cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" ... or b) ldapsearch ... -b "cn=backup, cn=tasks, cn=config" "(cn=backup_2012_4_5_13_36_23)" ... > if [ ${COUNT} -ne 0 ]; then > > sleep 5s > > fi > > done > > $(tar czf ${BACKUPPATH}${BKTSTAMP}-${INSTANCE}.tgz -C / ${DSBACKUPDIR#/*}) > > However the tar file is incomplete, because (assumption) the backup > has not finished writing to disk before tar starts.... > > For the time being I’ve settled on two scripts, one to start backups > and another to archive yesterdays (or older) backups. Not ideal but > workable > > Thanks again, > > Brett > > *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org> > [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of > *Noriko Hosoi > *Sent:* 05 April 2012 18:40 > *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > *Subject:* Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished? > > You could search the task.with nstaskstatus attribute. > > $ ldapsearch -LLLx -h localhost -p <port> -D 'cn=directory manager' -w > <pw> -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_*)" nstaskstatus > > When the task is done, you'll see the "Backup finished." status: > dn: cn=backup_2012_4_5_9_35_35,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > nstaskstatus: Backup finished. > > Another way would be checking the errors log, which logs the end of > the back up. > > > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backing up file 31 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-totoro/bak/totoro-2012_4_5_9_32_8/DBVERSION) > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backup finished. > > Thanks, > --noriko > MATON Brett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I want to tar up the backup set once a db2bak.pl backup job has finished. > > however because it writes an entry to the LDAP and doesn’t wait for > the backup to finish I was wondering what the best way to determine > when the backup has actually finished? > > I was thinking that I could > > Ldapsearch at intervals for the backup cn entry, when it’s not there > anymore backup has finished > > Ro maybe watch the audit log for a delete action on the backup cn entry.. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ >

1 0

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Rich Megginson 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

On 04/10/2012 01:48 AM, MATON Brett wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. > > For the record, status 32 was an error on my part, I hadn’t quoted > the bind DN so ldapsearch was actually complaining about the bind DN > not being found, not the backup task. > > Noriko, I’ve searched “cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config” and can’t find > nstaskstatus anywhere. I’m assuming that it also gets deleted once > the task is complete... > cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config is the parent entry for all backup task entries. When you create an entry under this parent, it starts the backup task. It is the backup task entry that has the nsTaskStatus attribute, not the parent entry "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config". When the backup task is complete, and the ttl is expired, the backup task entry is automatically removed. > I might just be having a dumb moment but I couldn’t think of an > efficient way to check the error log for a Backup Finished entry, > anyone with suggestions? > The best way is to do the ldapsearch as described above. > For the time being I’ve settled on two scripts, one to start backups > and another to archive yesterdays (or older) backups. Not ideal but > workable > > Thanks again, > > Brett > > *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of > *Noriko Hosoi > *Sent:* 05 April 2012 18:40 > *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > *Subject:* Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished? > > You could search the task.with nstaskstatus attribute. > > $ ldapsearch -LLLx -h localhost -p <port> -D 'cn=directory manager' -w > <pw> -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_*)" nstaskstatus > > When the task is done, you'll see the "Backup finished." status: > dn: cn=backup_2012_4_5_9_35_35,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config > nstaskstatus: Backup finished. > > Another way would be checking the errors log, which logs the end of > the back up. > > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backing up file 31 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-totoro/bak/totoro-2012_4_5_9_32_8/DBVERSION) > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backup finished. > > Thanks, > --noriko > MATON Brett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I want to tar up the backup set once a db2bak.pl backup job has finished. > > however because it writes an entry to the LDAP and doesn’t wait for > the backup to finish I was wondering what the best way to determine > when the backup has actually finished? > > I was thinking that I could > > Ldapsearch at intervals for the backup cn entry, when it’s not there > anymore backup has finished > > Ro maybe watch the audit log for a delete action on the backup cn entry.. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

1 0

request-que-backlog
by Jim Finn 10 Apr '12

10 Apr '12

With Sun/iPlanet directory server, we would monitor request-que-backlog under the cn=monitor dn to give us an indication of overload & the need for additional threads. Does such a backlog exist within 389-ds? If not, is there something similar we can use? Thanks, Jim Finn

2 1

389 version and build number
by Alberto Viana 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

I have a 389 DS (1.2.10.2), made a backup (using the option "Back up Directory Server" in the 389 ds console) and installed the lastest version (1.2.10.4). I used the option "Restore Directory Server" to restore all my configuration but after that in main 389 ds console windows, it shows me the old version/build number It´s happens to directory server and administration server. Is that the expected behavior? Can I change it manually? All my "nsslapd-pluginVersion" variable in the config shows me: 1.2.10.4. It´s no big deal, but i want to keep the correct version on this windows. Here´s 2 images: 1. before restore, shows me the correct verison/build number [image: Inline image 4] 2. After the restore, shows me the old version/build number [image: Inline image 7]

2 1

A Fast Way to Run 389-console Remotely
by Joel 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

Do to firewall issues, sometimes it is impossible to run a local copy of 389-console that can connect on all the correct ports. On the other hand, I'msure we have all experienced how slow 389-console is over ssh. To work around this, I install xpra on my server and remote client. Now I can do a: ssh server.server "xpra start :1001 --start-child 389-console" && \ xpra attach ssh:server.server:1001 && \ ssh server.server "xpra stop :1001" This first starts 389-console on the server with X going to a headless X server. Then the local machine connects to that server. Finally when done, the server at the distant end is closed. This is optional. You could leave it running all the time. Benefit is really fast 389-console with only firewall holes for ssh port. xpra is at: http://xpra.org and their is a fedora package review at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591 Joel

1 0

Renaming an instance
by Dave Jones 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

I have been searching around the Internet for instructions on how to rename an instance. Can anyone point me in the right direction? For example, I have my instance named "abc" and I want to name it "xyz" now. So I have the /etc/dirsrv/slapd-abc directory that I want to rename to /etc/dirsrv/slapd-xyz. Do I have to export to an LDIF, run setup-ds-admin.pl, to create the new instance, then import the LDIF into the new instance name? Or is there a shorter path? Thanks, Dave

2 1

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Noriko Hosoi 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

You could search the task.with nstaskstatus attribute. $ ldapsearch -LLLx -h localhost -p <port> -D 'cn=directory manager' -w <pw> -b "cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config" "(cn=backup_*)" nstaskstatus When the task is done, you'll see the "Backup finished." status: dn: cn=backup_2012_4_5_9_35_35,cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config nstaskstatus: Backup finished. Another way would be checking the errors log, which logs the end of the back up. > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backing up file 31 > (/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-totoro/bak/totoro-2012_4_5_9_32_8/DBVERSION) > [05/Apr/2012:09:32:09 -0700] - Backup finished. Thanks, --noriko MATON Brett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I want to tar up the backup set once a db2bak.pl backup job has finished. > > however because it writes an entry to the LDAP and doesn’t wait for > the backup to finish I was wondering what the best way to determine > when the backup has actually finished? > > I was thinking that I could > > Ldapsearch at intervals for the backup cn entry, when it’s not there > anymore backup has finished > > Ro maybe watch the audit log for a delete action on the backup cn entry.. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

1 0

Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished?
by Mark Reynolds 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

Hi Brett, I think running the ldapsearch, and checking for error 32 is the easiest option. I know you're not hitting this, but there are times when the task will stick around for a minute after its completed. In that case, you can search for the task, and request the attribute "nsTaskStatus". Then grep the value for "Backup finished", or "Backup failed". Regards, Mark On 04/05/2012 08:22 AM, MATON Brett wrote: > > Oops, the ldapsearch –b is wrong I think the search should be > > ldapsearch -x -H ${HOST} -D ${BINDAS} -b ' > cn=backup,cn=tasks,cn=config' -y ${PWFILE} 'cn=<tasked>' > > In short, if I immediately start the tar task after running db2bak.pl > in my script, the target backup directory doesn’t exist. > > So I need to check if the backup task has finished. > > The DB is so small here though that that task has finished ( and the > task deleted ) before I can run an ldapsearch to check the base and > filter (even if I put it in the script before ‘tar’). > > *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of > *MATON Brett > *Sent:* 05 April 2012 14:10 > *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > *Subject:* Re: [389-users] How to tell when database backup has finished? > > Bit of a fiddle: > > Execute the d2bak.pl script in verbose mode and extract the task name: > > task=$(${BACKUPCMD} -v -D "${BINDAS}" ${BACKUPOPTS} -a ${DSBACKUPDIR} > 2> /dev/null | grep "^adding new entry" ) > > ERR=$? > > task=${task#*\"} > > taskDN=${task%?} > > Syslog message and exit if script failed: > > if [ $ERR -ne 0 ]; then > > LogIt "FAILED (${ERR})." "user.err"; > > exit 1; > > fi > > Until “task” isn’t found ( 32 ) hang around here....: > > while [ ${ERR} != 32 ]; do > > (ldapsearch -x -H ${HOST} -D ${BINDAS} -b '${taskDN}' -y > ${PWFILE} > /dev/null 2>&1 ) > > ERR=$? > > if [ ${ERR} != 32 ]; then > > sleep 5s > > fi > > done > > Again any thoughts welcomed. > > Brett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB** > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *GreeNRB > */NRB considers its environmental responsibility and goes for green IT./ > /May we ask you to consider yours before printing this e-mail? /** > > *NRB, daring to commit > */This e-mail and any attachments, which may contain information that > is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights, are > intended for the exclusive use of the above-mentioned addressee(s). > Any use (including reproduction, disclosure and whole or partial > distribution in any form whatsoever) of their content is prohibited > without prior authorization of NRB. If you have received this message > by error, please contact the sender promptly by resending this e-mail > back to him (her), or by calling the above number. Thank you for > subsequently deleting this e-mail and any files attached thereto./ > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

2 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users April 2012