Hi
I was working like that but extremely slow even using all the
compression I could..
Now, the good news.
I have compiled the 389 Console for Mac and it works really well.
I have to make clear this is for my current server needs so the
following packages were installed AT server level:
389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch
389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-32.el6_5.x86_64
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32.el6_5.x86_64
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64
389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch
Said that, I will publish a bundle with my installation so that can be
ported into any Mac box.
I have tested on another box this setup, no tweaks required and it seems
to work perfectly fine...
Many thanks...
On 2014-06-05 23:12, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Why not use X11 from OS X? I use it regularly from Lion to open
389-console with no configuration changes needed except a Linux host
that allows X11 forwarding. I use Xquartz as my OSX X11 server, and
works very well. When I need to edit numerous records I also use
Apache Directory Studio. There is a native OS X and Linux version.
- Trey
On Jun 5, 2014 5:23 AM, <g.fer.ordas(a)unicyber.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got 389 running on a remote linux box,and I would like to get use
> of the Console without the need of exporting the X-Windows whenever
> I want to make a change as I also would prefer not to keep tweaking
> the configuration files all the time.
>
> is there anyway of doing this through any remote client?
>
> Any advise on this matter?
>
> Thanks very much
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users [1]
Links:
------
[1]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-u
sers