[389-users] Re: 389-ds-base-1.3.5.4 doesn't build on Mageia

[Thomas Spuhler]

On Monday, May 30, 2016 01:01:26 PM William Brown wrote:
>  On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 10:55 -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
>  > 389-ds-base-1.3.5.4 doesn't build on Mageia
>  > Altlinux reported the same problem with 389-ds-base-1.3.5.3
>  > 
>  > This is the error:
>  > /libslapd_la-ssl.o
>  > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c: In function 'svrcore_setup':
>  > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c:1291:5: error: unknown type name
>  > 'SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj' SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj *StdPinObj;
>  >      ^
>  > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c:1292:18: error: 'SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj'
>  > undeclared (first use in this function) StdPinObj =
>  > (SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj *)SVRCORE_GetRegisteredPinObj();
>  > 
>  > See log
>  > http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/2016052
>  > 8191035.spuhler.duvel.44896/log/389-ds-base-1
>  > .3.5.4-1.mga6/build.0.20160528191128.log
>  > 
>  > The attached patch makes it build
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  Sorry but we won't be applying that patch as it reverses the behaviour of
>  the WITH_SYSTEMD flag (IE, on systems without systemd, it would try and
>  build with it ...)
>  
>  Your distro needs to update SVRCore. The 389-ds project now owns svrcore,
>  and has updated it from 4.0.4 to 4.1.2.
>  
>  https://pagure.io/svrcore
>  
>  Svrcore 4.1.2 is required to support WITH_SYSTEMD on 389-ds 1.3.5. 4.1.2 of
>  course provides the needed SVRCORE_CreateStdSystemdPinObj types.
>  
>  The design doc around this feature can be found here:
>  
>  https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/systemd-ask-pass.html
>  
>  
>  Alternately, this could be changed with a header / function check  (IE
>  WITH_SVRCORE_CreateStdSystemdPinObj).
>  
>  We don't think it's worth it though, as the fix that svrcore 4.1.2 brings to
>  using ssl without a pin.txt on systemd is very, very valueable to
>  administrators.
>  
>  If you need help with upgrade svrcore on your distro, please feel free to
>  ask, 
Thanks a lot for your reply, especially on Memorial Day. I see now that the 
requirement was added to the Fedora 389-ds-base spec.


-- 
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler

All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63