RHDS 9.1
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-30.el6_5.x86_64
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org]
On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:55 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 10:47 AM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
Hi All –
We had a bundle of problems with our MM/consumer setup. Ran of out FDs on the consumers, had the slapd process on a master die, etc.
Platform? 389-ds-base version? rpm -q 389-ds-base
We’re getting things back up and running properly, but having some replication issues now. We’ve got it mostly cleaned up – the masters are in sync, and all consumers but 1 hub.
However, 1 hub has 3 naming conflicts on an entry. How can we resolve these? Since it’s read-only, the normal documented processes won’t work of course. The non-conflicted entry isn’t receiving updates from the masters. We use the directory
for PKI, and the entry contains a CRL that is going to expire – not good.
Do we need to just wait, and the actual entry will get updated at some point? With the errors we had, it seemed to take a long time for the directories to replicate around and catch up.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users