On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 19:03 +0000, Brian Lehnhardt wrote:
Does anyone use keepalived with a mult-master setup? I'm
currently
using an haproxy, but I think just using a vip between the two
masters should be sufficient for my use case. I'm curious how
keepalived would work with a 389 server.
Hey there,
I would really advise sharing a VIP between the two masters like this.
A loadbalancer is a better idea, or most clients have the ability to
specify multiple servers.
I've written up some stuff in the past about zero-downtime migrations
of ldap that might help give some ideas.
https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/html/2016/06/03/zero_outage_migration_
of_directory_server_infrastructure.html?highlight=zero
Hope that helps,
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.o
rg
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
es
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-user
s(a)lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7XESO334O4ETQKGL3WSJF4QQERAGLIO6/
--
Sincerely,
William