Thank you Rich, I will definitely help testing the alpha release once it is available.

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thanks for your explanation.
>
> I know that #567429 is a low priority bug, but is there a time frame
> or which version of 389-DS will have a fix for this bug?
Probably 1.2.6 or 1.2.7 final release.  Should show up in an alpha
release in a few weeks.
>
> - David
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
>     > Hi Rich,
>     >
>     > Just a quick question.
>     >
>     > I submitted Bugzilla ticket# 567429 for this issue.  When I
>     check the
>     > status today, I noticed that the "Blocks" field is set to 434914.
>     > When I click on 434914, it said I am not authorized to view this
>     bug.
>     It's an internal tracking bug.  It's how we target bugs for a
>     particular
>     release.  If it's blocked that means it is an internal Red Hat
>     tracker.
>     >
>     > I guess my question is what exactly does the "Blocks" field mean.  I
>     > clicked on "Help" on the Bugzilla page and searched for "Blocks"
>     but I
>     > cannot find a definition for it.
>     Blocks means either that the bug really does "block" or prevent
>     testing
>     or solving the bug that it blocks, or it means it is a tracking bug.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     > David
>     >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users