Hi,

Below is one of the few complex filters which don’t work properly

Example:

Filter:  "(&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1 est))(&(gidnumber=20))(uidnumber=2559)(&(sn=est)))"

In this case, filter ignores “uidnumber=2559”  after assigning the decoders to this filter. Log details are given below how it actually behaves

[07/Aug/2012:09:40:12 +0200]:09:40:12 +0200] get_filter -  after optimize: (&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1 est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=2559)(&))
[07/Aug/2012 get_filter - before optimize: (&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1 est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=2559)(&))

[07/Aug/2012:09:40:12 +0200] index_subsys_assign_filter_decoders - before: (&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1 est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=25
59)(&(sn=est)))     ---à Before assigning filter decoder it looks like

[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0

[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] index_subsys_assign_filter_decoders -  after: (&(uid=test1)(cn=t1 est)(gidNumber=20)(sn=est))    -à  here it missed “uidNumber=2559”

Is this a bug or its expected behavior? If yes, is there any specific reason why it ignores this particular filter?

Regards,

Jyoti