Richard Megginson wrote:
Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> Rob Crittenden wrote:
>
>> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
>> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely
>> compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
>
> Just a quick followup on this. I am going to try it myself soon.
> Is the FC6 build actually the correct one
Yes.
> or will there be a
> "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
> future?
>
Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.
Thanks for the clarification! I'll be sure to give the community
a shout if I find any issues.
--
Daryle A. Tilroe