Hi Russell,
Thank you for your scripts.
I did not configure SSL for any particular bit of the software, I just
followed the instructions given in the document "Configuring SSL Enabled
Fedora Directory Server" found in fedora project's website. At a point
it links to your script. I was wondering if the problem might come from
likely differences between Centos 5 and Centos 5.
Thank you for your hint. I will look into it.
Alberto.
Russell Beall wrote:
Sure. Unfortunately you've gone beyond my limited experience
with issues with the admin-server. I haven't configured SSL for the admin server,
though I did get SSL working for the directory server.
I'll have to leave the rest of this to someone more experienced.
However, I have debugged issues like this, and one simple thing to make sure of is that
the whole directory tree is accessible to the user that runs the process. Is the process
owner of the admin server fedora-ds and does that user have read access to the whole tree?
If you become that user can you see the files?
Regards,
Russ.
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Alberto Suárez wrote:
> Thank you for your prompt reply. I am running Centos 6.2 64 bits. To be honest, I am
a bit lost with so many things to take into account...
>
> Right now I am a bit stuck at configuring TLS. I executed the script
"setupssl2.sh" kindly provided by Rich Megginson and now i can no longer start
the administration server. When I execute "service server-admin I get the following
error message:
>
> httpd.worker: Syntax error on line 735 of /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/httpd.conf: Could
not open configuartion file /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/nss.conf: Permission denied
>
> I have played with that file's permissions, even setting them as 777, but nothing
changes. It is currently owned by user "fedora-ds" group "fedora-ds"
and permissions are set to 400.
>
> Thank you again.
>
> Regards,
> Alberto.
>
> Russell Beall wrote:
>> I had very few OS-related issues setting up on CentOS 6.2. I set a node up in
this OS alongside a node in RedHat 6.2 and the settings for the directoryserver are
identical. I was pleased at the very large quantity of documentation at the redhat site
which describes every aspect of the product in very complete detail.
>>
>> The documentation at RedHat never seemed very OS-specific to me, and the only
differences I generally saw were where the documentation had differing instructions based
on the older "fedora" version of the directory server.
>>
>> What system differences did you encounter?
>>
>> Is your issue related to being on a 32-bit system instead of a 64-bit system?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Russ.
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Alberto Suárez wrote:
>>
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I am struggling to set up 389DS on Centos 6.2. I can hardly find any
information on how to do it, as everything is written for Centos 5. Due to the changes
introduced in Centos 6 and the lack of information, I am finding it a nightmare, every
step I make I run into new issues. Any help?
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users