On 03/08/2012 11:05 AM, mjames@guesswho.com wrote:

Thx for the heads-up. Would I be better off just adding the new server with a new IP address as a multi-master, then removing the old one? Not re-using either the hostname or IP?

That would certainly be easier.

 

From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:52 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Michael James
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

 

On 03/08/2012 10:53 AM, mjames@guesswho.com wrote:

@Rich, we are not re-using the hostname, just the IP address. --Mike

That's going to be a problem for replication, chaining, tls/ssl, kerberos, and anything else like that which uses the fqdn.

 

From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:47 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

 

On 03/08/2012 10:45 AM, Gerhardus Geldenhuis wrote:

Not sure I was much help. I am sure Rich will jump into the conversation. I am proper back at work next week and can then dig around and give you a more complete answer with regards to exact steps if you can wait that long.

 

Regards

On 8 March 2012 17:37, <mjames@guesswho.com> wrote:

@Gerhardus - Thanks for your help. I inherited the setup. 2 servers with multi-master replication on RH 5.6 / 5.7. The new replacement server will be CentOS 6.2. Version info follows.

Are you going to reuse the hostnames as well as the IP addresses?





--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

 



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users