On 17 Jun 2019, at 18:59, Mailvaganam, Hari
<hari.mailvaganam(a)ubc.ca> wrote:
Hi:
At the moment we perform TCP health check via F5 on ports 389/636 (historical
inheritance) – which isn’t sufficient for HA.
We are moving to an env where NSX and F5 may co-exist – and have an opportunity to
re-work the LB health check for HA (on existing F5 and upcoming NSX).
If running NSX and/or F5 (or other load balancers) – how do you determine health on ldap
node?
What methods does the F5 support for checks? I think it could be valuable to understand
this, because if we could supply some healthchecking systems or advice from upstream, this
would help people like yourself.
We have 2 read/write (1 active at given time) – replicating to N read-only nodes.
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs