Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.

[Daryle A. Tilroe]

Rob Crittenden wrote:

>  Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
>  2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely
>  compatible and modules need to be recompiled. 
Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
Is the FC6 build actually the correct one or will there be a
"proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
future?

-- 
Daryle A. Tilroe

[Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.

[Rich Megginson]

Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
>  Rob Crittenden wrote:
>
> > Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
> > 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely
> > compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
>
>  Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
>  Is the FC6 build actually the correct one 
Yes.
>  or will there be a
>  "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
>  future?
>  
Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5.

[Fedora-directory-users] Problem with fds 1.0.4 on Red Hat 5 64 bits.

[Daryle A. Tilroe]

Richard Megginson wrote:

>  Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
>  
> > Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >
> >> Try the FC6 build instead. The problem is that RHEL4 uses Apache
> >> 2.0.52 and RHEL 5 uses Apache 2.2.3. Their API's are not completely
> >> compatible and modules need to be recompiled.
> >
> > Just a quick followup on this.  I am going to try it myself soon.
> > Is the FC6 build actually the correct one
>  
>  Yes.
>  
> > or will there be a
> > "proper" FDS 1.0.4 rpm for RHEL5 64bit at any point in the near
> > future?
> >
>  Probably only if there is some problem with the FC6 binary on RHEL5. 
Thanks for the clarification!  I'll be sure to give the community
a shout if I find any issues.

-- 
Daryle A. Tilroe