On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 19:08 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 02:48 PM, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:31 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 04/26/2011 02:30 PM, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
>>>> I'm using luma to modify users passwords, until 389-ds-base 1.2.6
>>>> everything worked ok. but with 126.96.36.199 the updated password isn't
>>>> propagating to the slaves.
>>>> However, with 389-console, passwd or even ldapmodify it works ok.
>>>> auditing the process, I found that luma deletes the userpasswd attibute
>>>> and adds it again. 389-console and passwd only modifies the attribute.
>>>> I have 4 ldap servers (1 master, 3 slaves) and 1 AD server.
>>>> Is this behavior expected in 188.8.131.52?
>>> Sounds like a dup of
>> thanks for the fast reply, however the problem here looks different,
>> because in the slave we are not seeing any change. looks like the master
>> is not sending updates when luma deletes and adds again the attribute.
>> Also, I tested if the password is synced to AD, and works ok when I
>> change it with luma. The problem appears only between 389-ds servers.
> Does this only happen with the userPassword attribute?
I tested other attributes, like cn, sn, and some attributes from a
schema created by us, and they are all working. so it appears to be only
userPassword with the problem.
Thanks. Can you please open a bug at