8:30 p.m.
Hi there,
I'm trying to get started testing out Fedora Directory Server with the
goal of replacing our OpenLDAP infrastructure. Most of our servers are
RHEL3/4 so there are no big issues there since there are already
prepackaged binary RPMS for those platforms.
But we do have two RHEL2.1 server which we will definitely need packages
for in order to do any migration to FDS. Upgrading these servers to
RHEL3/4 is not an option. Looking at the spec file of the SRPM from
RHEL3 it seems like dependencies won't be a problem, the spec file
itself is a mess and doesn't come close to building everything (which I
understand is a work in progress).
So my questions are: has anyone got FDS running well on RHEL2.1 (either
by compiling directly from source, shoehorning the RPM from RHEL3 or
building the RPM from the SRPM)? Has anyone written their own spec file
from scratch to build FDS in its entirety from sources? I also wanted to
change the installation prefix from /opt so getting a working and
complete spec file would be very desirable.
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
10:10 a.m.
Oliver Hookins wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to get started testing out Fedora Directory Server with the
goal of replacing our OpenLDAP infrastructure. Most of our servers are
RHEL3/4 so there are no big issues there since there are already
prepackaged binary RPMS for those platforms.
But we do have two RHEL2.1 server which we will definitely need
packages for in order to do any migration to FDS. Upgrading these
servers to RHEL3/4 is not an option. Looking at the spec file of the
SRPM from RHEL3 it seems like dependencies won't be a problem, the
spec file itself is a mess and doesn't come close to building
everything (which I understand is a work in progress).
So my questions are: has anyone got FDS running well on RHEL2.1
(either by compiling directly from source, shoehorning the RPM from
RHEL3 or building the RPM from the SRPM)? Has anyone written their own
spec file from scratch to build FDS in its entirety from sources? I
also wanted to change the installation prefix from /opt so getting a
working and complete spec file would be very desirable.
It's going to be a few
weeks until we have a buildable srpm. In the
meantime, I suggest you try
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
8:46 p.m.
Richard Megginson wrote:
It's going to be a few weeks until we have a buildable srpm. In
the
meantime, I suggest you try
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
I don't want to place unpackaged files onto my test machines so I was
going to write up my own spec file based on the build instructions. I
was hoping someone might have already done this though... no point in
duplicating work!
To be honest I'm more interested in anyone's success with RHEL2.1 though
as this is a critical point for us.
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
4:29 a.m.
On Fri Jul 07, 2006 at 09:10:32 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote:
It's going to be a few weeks until we have a buildable srpm. In
the
meantime, I suggest you try
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
Has any progress been made on the srpm packages? I have been skimming the
list traffic and nothing has caught my eye.
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
8:57 a.m.
Oliver Hookins wrote:
On Fri Jul 07, 2006 at 09:10:32 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote:
> It's going to be a few weeks until we have a buildable srpm. In the
> meantime, I suggest you try
> http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
>
Has any progress been made on the srpm packages? I have been skimming the
list traffic and nothing has caught my eye.
We're still working on it (funny how a few weeks has become many weeks :-P
We are making progress. Note that the next major (i.e. not patch)
release of the product will use discrete RPM packaging, and each
discrete RPM will have a buildable SRPM.
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Discrete_Packaging
11:16 a.m.
El jue, 05-10-2006 a las 07:57 -0600, Richard Megginson escribió:
We are making progress. Note that the next major (i.e. not patch)
release of the product will use discrete RPM packaging, and each
discrete RPM will have a buildable SRPM.
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Discrete_Packaging
Thanks for the info.
1) When do you expect the packages to be available?
2) Will the FC5 packages conform to the FHS?
--
Oscar A. Valdez
11:32 a.m.
Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
El jue, 05-10-2006 a las 07:57 -0600, Richard Megginson escribió:
> We are making progress. Note that the next major (i.e. not patch)
> release of the product will use discrete RPM packaging, and each
> discrete RPM will have a buildable SRPM.
> http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Discrete_Packaging
>
Thanks for the info.
1) When do you expect the packages to be available?
Don't know. We are hoping to have a beta in the next couple of weeks.
2) Will the FC5 packages conform to the FHS?
We have proposed this to the Fedora DS community. There has been much,
much heated debate on both sides of this issue. Some people vehemently
oppose FHS package, some welcome and encourage it. The Fedora DS
developers are still trying to figure out a way to do what's right for
the community. We can certainly make it easy to build your own package
from source using either FHS or self-contained style packaging. The
real problem is that it is very difficult to provide binary packages and
documentation for both formats . . .
5:44 a.m.
On Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 10:32:54 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote:
>
We have proposed this to the Fedora DS community. There has been much,
much heated debate on both sides of this issue. Some people vehemently
oppose FHS package, some welcome and encourage it. The Fedora DS
developers are still trying to figure out a way to do what's right for
the community. We can certainly make it easy to build your own package
from source using either FHS or self-contained style packaging. The
real problem is that it is very difficult to provide binary packages and
documentation for both formats . . .
OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1?
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
6:55 p.m.
On Sun Oct 15, 2006 at 20:44:44 +1000, Oliver Hookins wrote:
OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1?
I guess nobody has... well in any case I've downloaded the dsbuild 1.0.3
tarball and attempted to do a build on RHEL ES 2.1. Not surprisingly, it
fails. Can anyone shed some light on these error messages? I started the
build with make BUILD_RPM=1 NOJAVA=1 SNMP_SOURCE=1
make FREEBL_CHILD_BUILD=1 \
OBJDIR=OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB libs
make[5]: Entering directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
rm -f OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so
gcc -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-soname -Wl,libfreebl3.so
-Wl,--version-script,OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/freebl.def -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/freeblver.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/ldvector.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/prng_fips1861.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sysrand.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sha_fast.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/md2.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/md5.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sha512.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/alghmac.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rawhash.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/alg2268.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/arcfour.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/arcfive.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/desblapi.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/des.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rijndael.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/aeskeywrap.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/dh.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/ec.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/pqg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/dsa.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rsa.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/shvfy.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/tlsprfalg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpprime.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpmontg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mplogic.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpi.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mp_gf2m.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpcpucache.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpi_x86.o
../../../../dist/OPT.OBJ/lib/libsecutil.a -L../../../../dist/OPT.OBJ/lib
-lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -lc/lib/libc.so.6: undefined
reference to `_dl_lazy(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_dst_substitute(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_out_of_memory(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_relocate_object(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_clktck(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_platformlen(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
`_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
`_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_mcount(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_dst_count(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_initial_searchlist(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_start_profile(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_stack_end(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_argv(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../libpthread.so: undefined
reference to `_dl_cpuclock_offset'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_loaded(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_origin_path(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_check_map_versions(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_main_searchlist(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_mask(a)GLIBC_2.2.3'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_load_lock(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_state(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init_all_dirs(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_r_debug(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_unload_cache(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_printf(a)GLIBC_2.2.3'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_all_dirs(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object_deps(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_nloaded(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_map(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_output(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_pagesize(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_fpu_control(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../libdl.so: undefined
reference to `_dl_catch_error'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope_alloc(a)GLIBC_2.1'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib'
make[2]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss'
make[1]: *** [build-custom] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla'
make: *** [dep-../../ds/mozilla] Error 2
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
9:27 a.m.
Oliver Hookins wrote:
On Sun Oct 15, 2006 at 20:44:44 +1000, Oliver Hookins wrote:
> OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1?
>
I guess nobody has... well in any case I've downloaded the dsbuild 1.0.3
tarball and attempted to do a build on RHEL ES 2.1. Not surprisingly, it
fails. Can anyone shed some light on these error messages? I started the
build with make BUILD_RPM=1 NOJAVA=1 SNMP_SOURCE=1
I'm not sure, but it looks like a glibc compatability issue. You might
have to install some sort of gcc or glibc compat package. On the other
hand, it may require a newer version of gcc/glibc than AS 2.1 has.
make FREEBL_CHILD_BUILD=1 \
OBJDIR=OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB libs
make[5]: Entering directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
rm -f OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so
gcc -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-soname -Wl,libfreebl3.so
-Wl,--version-script,OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/freebl.def -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/freeblver.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/ldvector.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/prng_fips1861.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sysrand.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sha_fast.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/md2.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/md5.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/sha512.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/alghmac.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rawhash.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/alg2268.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/arcfour.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/arcfive.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/desblapi.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/des.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rijndael.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/aeskeywrap.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/dh.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/ec.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/pqg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/dsa.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/rsa.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/shvfy.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/tlsprfalg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpprime.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpmontg.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mplogic.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpi.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mp_gf2m.o OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpcpucache.o
OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/mpi_x86.o
../../../../dist/OPT.OBJ/lib/libsecutil.a -L../../../../dist/OPT.OBJ/lib
-lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -lc/lib/libc.so.6: undefined
reference to `_dl_lazy(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_dst_substitute(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_out_of_memory(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_relocate_object(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_clktck(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_platformlen(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
`_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
`_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_mcount(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_dst_count(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_initial_searchlist(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_start_profile(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_stack_end(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_argv(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../libpthread.so: undefined
reference to `_dl_cpuclock_offset'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_loaded(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_origin_path(a)GLIBC_2.1.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_check_map_versions(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_main_searchlist(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_mask(a)GLIBC_2.2.3'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_load_lock(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_state(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init_all_dirs(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_r_debug(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_unload_cache(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_printf(a)GLIBC_2.2.3'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_all_dirs(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object_deps(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_nloaded(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_map(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_output(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_pagesize(a)GLIBC_2.2'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_fpu_control(a)GLIBC_2.1'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../../libdl.so: undefined
reference to `_dl_catch_error'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope_alloc(a)GLIBC_2.1'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [OPT.OBJ/Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/libfreebl3.so] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib/freebl'
make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss/lib'
make[2]: *** [libs] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/security/nss'
make[1]: *** [build-custom] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/share/rpmbuild/BUILD/dsbuild-fds103/ds/mozilla'
make: *** [dep-../../ds/mozilla] Error 2
6:40 p.m.
On Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 08:27:54 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
Oliver Hookins wrote:
>On Sun Oct 15, 2006 at 20:44:44 +1000, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>
>>OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1?
>>
>
>I guess nobody has... well in any case I've downloaded the dsbuild 1.0.3
>tarball and attempted to do a build on RHEL ES 2.1. Not surprisingly, it
>fails. Can anyone shed some light on these error messages? I started the
>build with make BUILD_RPM=1 NOJAVA=1 SNMP_SOURCE=1
>
I'm not sure, but it looks like a glibc compatability issue. You might
have to install some sort of gcc or glibc compat package. On the other
hand, it may require a newer version of gcc/glibc than AS 2.1 has.
Most of the errors suggest it is looking for GLIBC 2.0 and 2.1 procedures,
while the system has GLIBC 2.2.4 installed. I installed the compat-glibc
package which has 2.1 but including this in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH first causes
make to bail out because it requires 2.2 and apparently it gives up at the
first libc file it examines.
If there is no way around this particular thing, perhaps your suggestion of
using a later version of GLIBC will be the answer. Is there an easy way to
signal dsbuild to statically link GLIBC or will it require editing a lot of
files?
--
Regards,
Oliver Hookins
Anchor Systems
9:03 p.m.
Oliver Hookins wrote:
On Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 08:27:54 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> Oliver Hookins wrote:
>
>> On Sun Oct 15, 2006 at 20:44:44 +1000, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1?
>>>
>>>
>> I guess nobody has... well in any case I've downloaded the dsbuild 1.0.3
>> tarball and attempted to do a build on RHEL ES 2.1. Not surprisingly, it
>> fails. Can anyone shed some light on these error messages? I started the
>> build with make BUILD_RPM=1 NOJAVA=1 SNMP_SOURCE=1
>>
>>
> I'm not sure, but it looks like a glibc compatability issue. You might
> have to install some sort of gcc or glibc compat package. On the other
> hand, it may require a newer version of gcc/glibc than AS 2.1 has.
>
Most of the errors suggest it is looking for GLIBC 2.0 and 2.1 procedures,
while the system has GLIBC 2.2.4 installed. I installed the compat-glibc
package which has 2.1 but including this in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH first causes
make to bail out because it requires 2.2 and apparently it gives up at the
first libc file it examines.
Maybe there is a compat-make?
If there is no way around this particular thing, perhaps your
suggestion of
using a later version of GLIBC will be the answer. Is there an easy way to
signal dsbuild to statically link GLIBC or will it require editing a lot of
files?
I have no idea. This is highly not-recommended to do.
6380
days inactive
6498
days old
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Oliver Hookins -
Oscar A. Valdez -
Rich Megginson